-
Kenya's economy faces climate change risks: World Bank
-
Trump says Hormuz to 'completely open' after US-Iran peace deal
-
Timeline of Trump-linked resort project in Albania
-
IMF chief warns energy recovery to take time after US-Iran ceasefire
-
Launch 3 Telecom Secures New Lakeland Facility
-
'Start your engines'? Shipping groups wary on Hormuz reopening
-
US-Iran deal met with hope, scepticism in Mideast
-
German working-age population to shrink dramatically: study
-
'For sure': Macron to preach stronger Europe vision at G7 swansong
-
Crude prices plunge, stocks surge on US-Iran peace deal
-
Starbucks Korea to shutter outlets for history lessons after 'Tank Day' fiasco
-
Courts cracking down on error-strewn AI-assisted legal briefs
-
Bitter communion: Cuban priests ordered to ration mass wafers
-
In crisis-hit Cuba, World Cup offers brief respite
-
UK intercepts Russian shadow fleet vessel in Channel
-
London, Tokyo agree $24-bn investment deal
-
Indonesian economy comes up for air but struggles to win back investors
-
Trump says US-Iran deal to be signed Sunday, Hormuz to open after
-
Between Trump and a hard place: Fed chair Warsh to lead first rate meeting
-
High-school drop out to big time crime boss, Venezuela's 'Nino Guerrero'
-
US-Iran deal could be finalised soon, mediator Pakistan says
-
Thousands gather in Thai capital to mourn late princess
-
US says downed multiple Iran drones as both insist deal closer
-
SpaceX: Five key moments, from first launch to Starship megarocket
-
US clears Paramount's $111 bn Warner Bros. takeover
-
Iran and US say deal closer than ever
-
Cuba opens more sectors to private business
-
World Cup struggles to ignite US excitement
-
US appellate court upholds Sam Bankman-Fried criminal sentence
-
France bids farewell to girl, 11, whose killing sparked outrage
-
Wall Street wobbles as SpaceX shares launch, oil slides on Mideast deal hopes
-
SpaceX lifts off in record Wall Street debut
-
US deportation flight carrying Iranians en route to C.African Republic
-
At a Libyan university once ravaged by war, students dream again
-
Kenya mourns schoolgirls killed in suspected dorm arson attack
-
Stocks rally, oil slides on Mideast deal hopes
-
'All of us of are migrants,' pope says in Canary Islands
-
Switzerland split on immigration vote: four perspectives
-
Thai princess dies aged 47 after three years in hospital
-
Science fiction? Musk's lofty SpaceX goals unrealistic, skeptics say
-
Asia stocks up, oil down on Mideast deal hopes
-
From cage fights to the White House, UFC marches into mainstream
-
Pope ends Spain visit with migrant meetings
-
Ex-Tottenham owner sells art collection in blockbuster auction
-
Antarctic Peninsula sees record high June temperatures
-
US stocks rally, oil prices fall as Trump calls off fresh Iran strikes
-
SpaceX to make historic IPO that could make Musk a trillionaire
-
El Nino is back, but its effects vary widely
-
First leather bag from T-Rex cells to be auctioned in Paris
-
Four times as many icebergs calved from Greenland glaciers: study
Sheeran copyright battle could stoke songwriting paranoia
Ed Sheeran is preparing for a blockbuster tour and album release amid regular trips to Manhattan's federal court, where he's defending his songwriting in a closely watched copyright case.
The trial centers on whether the British pop phenom plagiarized Marvin Gaye's 1973 soul classic "Let's Get It On" in his 2014 hit "Thinking Out Loud."
The heirs of Ed Townsend, who co-wrote Gaye's smash, are behind the civil suit, and allege "striking similarities and overt common elements" between the songs.
It's the latest in a series of high-profile music copyright cases that have the industry on edge, leaving some songwriters paranoid about their own creative processes and vulnerability to litigation.
Sheeran, 32, has spent days testifying with guitar in hand, playing demos for the court to prove the 1-3-4-5 chord progression that's primarily in question is a basic building block of pop music that can't be owned.
His legal team argues that Gaye and Townsend were far from the first to record it, citing, for example, a number of Van Morrison songs that use the sequence and that were released prior to "Let's Get It On."
It's a notion echoed by forensic musicologist Joe Bennett.
"The world I want to live in is one where nobody sues anyone for a one- or two-bar melodic or harmonic similarity, because those similarities can so easily occur through coincidence," the professor at Massachusetts' Berklee College of Music told AFP.
"They shouldn't be protectable by copyright."
The case hinges on the actual composition of the songs rather than the recorded versions -- think sheet music, not vibes.
In theory that's a specificity that could help Sheeran's case, but once a music copyright suit reaches the point of jury trial, anything can happen.
Winning demands significant funding and resources, and defendants are beholden to the volatility of opinions from jury members who almost certainly don't have a background in musicology.
Both sides have hired expert witnesses to explain the technical details to jurors, but, of course, their conclusions differ significantly.
"If you play music to a jury, it could go either way," Bennett said.
- 'Chilling effect' -
There have been a handful of landmark music copyright cases in recent years, notably in 2016 when Gaye's family -- who is not part of the New York lawsuit against Sheeran -- successfully sued the artists Robin Thicke and Pharrell Williams over similarities between the song "Blurred Lines" and Gaye's "Got to Give it Up."
The result surprised many in the industry, including legal experts, who considered many of the musical components cited as foundational, and existing largely in the public domain.
Shortly thereafter an appeals court decision confirmed Led Zeppelin's victory over a similar case centered on the classic "Stairway to Heaven" -- a boon for songwriters.
"One reason that this Ed Sheeran case may be really important to the industry is that it's a data point that would show well is the pendulum actually back on the other side, or are we just going back and forth?" said Joseph Fishman, a law professor specialized in intellectual property at Vanderbilt University.
"If it's going back and forth, that could still have a chilling effect on how songwriters write, because you never know -- is my case going to be the one?"
And unintended infringement is a weak defense: in 1976, George Harrison was found liable for "subconsciously" plagiarizing "He's So Fine" by the Chiffons for his first solo hit "My Sweet Lord."
In his memoir Harrison later wrote that he suffered a "paranoia about songwriting that had started to build up in me."
This week Sheeran told the court that fellow songwriters have told him "you have to win this for us" adding with a tone of exasperation that if the Townsend estate prevails, "I'm done."
"I find it really insulting to work my whole life... and have someone diminish it by saying that I stole it," Sheeran said on the stand Monday.
Bennett said many of his students at Berklee -- a prestigious conservatory of contemporary music -- have voiced concern over the Sheeran case, speaking as the next generation of songwriters.
One of them, 21-year-old Mary Jo Swank, told AFP that "I've definitely grown a fear that the idea of being completely original and unique is going to put the emotional and creative process of a songwriter in jeopardy."
"It'd be nice if I'd be allowed to write my take on a 1-3-4-5 progression without having to worry that it's not unique enough."
M.García--CPN