-
Kenya's economy faces climate change risks: World Bank
-
Norway crown princess likely to undergo lung transplant
-
France's budget hits snag in setback for embattled PM
-
Volatile Oracle shares a proxy for Wall Street's AI jitters
-
Japan hikes interest rates to 30-year-high
-
Brazil's top court strikes down law blocking Indigenous land claims
-
'We are ghosts': Britain's migrant night workers
-
Asian markets rise as US inflation eases, Micron soothes tech fears
-
Trump signs $900 bn defense policy bill into law
-
EU-Mercosur deal delayed as farmers stage Brussels show of force
-
Harrison Ford to get lifetime acting award
-
Trump health chief seeks to bar trans youth from gender-affirming care
-
Argentine unions in the street over Milei labor reforms
-
Brazil open to EU-Mercosur deal delay as farmers protest in Brussels
-
Brussels farmer protest turns ugly as EU-Mercosur deal teeters
-
US accuses S. Africa of harassing US officials working with Afrikaners
-
ECB holds rates as Lagarde stresses heightened uncertainty
-
Trump Media announces merger with fusion power company
-
Stocks rise as US inflation cools, tech stocks bounce
-
Zelensky presses EU to tap Russian assets at crunch summit
-
Danish 'ghetto' residents upbeat after EU court ruling
-
ECB holds rates but debate swirls over future
-
Bank of England cuts interest rate after UK inflation slides
-
Have Iran's authorities given up on the mandatory hijab?
-
British energy giant BP extends shakeup with new CEO pick
-
EU kicks off crunch summit on Russian asset plan for Ukraine
-
Sri Lanka plans $1.6 bn in cyclone recovery spending in 2026
-
Most Asian markets track Wall St lower as AI fears mount
-
Danish 'ghetto' tenants hope for EU discrimination win
-
What to know about the EU-Mercosur deal
-
Trump vows economic boom, blames Biden in address to nation
-
ECB set to hold rates but debate swirls over future
-
EU holds crunch summit on Russian asset plan for Ukraine
-
Nasdaq tumbles on renewed angst over AI building boom
-
Billionaire Trump nominee confirmed to lead NASA amid Moon race
-
CNN's future unclear as Trump applies pressure
-
German MPs approve 50 bn euros in military purchases
-
EU's Mercosur trade deal hits French, Italian roadblock
-
Warner Bros rejects Paramount bid, sticks with Netflix
-
Crude prices surge after Trump orders Venezuela oil blockade
-
Warner Bros. Discovery rejects Paramount bid
-
Doctors in England go on strike for 14th time
-
Ghana's Highlife finds its rhythm on UNESCO world stage
-
Stocks gain as traders bet on interest rate moves
-
France probes 'foreign interference' after malware found on ferry
-
Europe's Ariane 6 rocket puts EU navigation satellites in orbit
-
Bleak end to the year as German business morale drops
-
Hundreds queue at Louvre museum as strike vote delays opening
-
Markets rise even as US jobs data fail to boost rate cut bets
-
Asian markets mixed as US jobs data fails to boost rate cut hopes
Half of world's glaciers expected to vanish by 2100: study
Half of the Earth's glaciers, notably smaller ones, are destined to disappear by the end of the century because of climate change, but limiting global warming could save others, according to a new study.
The findings, published in the journal Science on Thursday, provide the most comprehensive look so far at the future of the world's 215,000 glaciers.
The authors emphasized the importance of restricting greenhouse gas emissions to limit the consequences from glacier melt such as sea level rise and depletion of water resources.
To help orient policy makers, the study looked at the impact of four scenarios on glaciers, where global mean temperature change is 1.5 degrees Celsius (2.7 degrees Fahrenheit), 2.0C, 3.0C and 4.0C.
"Every degree increase produces more melt and loss," said Regine Hock of the University of Oslo and University of Alaska Fairbanks, a co-author of the study.
"But that also means if you reduce the temperature increase, you can also reduce that mass loss," Hock told AFP. "So in that sense, there is also a little bit of hope."
Even if global temperature rise is limited to 1.5C above pre-industrial levels -- the most ambitious goal of the Paris Agreement -- the researchers estimated that 49 percent of the world's glaciers would vanish by the year 2100.
That would represent about 26 percent of the world's glacier mass because the smallest glaciers would be those first impacted.
Global mean temperature is currently estimated to be increasing by 2.7C which would result in a near-complete loss of glaciers in Central Europe, Western Canada and the continental United States and New Zealand.
"Regions with relatively little ice like the European Alps, the Caucasus, the Andes, or the western US, they lose almost all the ice by the end of the century almost no matter what the emission scenario is," Hock said. "So those glaciers, they're more or less doomed."
- 'Up to the policy makers' -
Under the worst-case scenario -- global temperature rise of 4.0C -- giant glaciers such as those in Alaska would be more affected and 83 percent of glaciers would disappear by the end of the century.
Glacier loss would also exacerbate sea level rise.
"The glaciers that we are studying are only one percent of all ice on Earth," said Hock, "much less than the Greenland ice sheet and the Antarctic ice sheet.
"But they have contributed to sea level rise almost just as much as the Greenland and Antarctic ice sheet together in the last three decades," she said.
Warming of 1.5C would lead to an increase in average sea levels of nine centimeters while temperatures 4.0C higher would cause 15 centimeters of sea level rise.
"It doesn't sound very much, nine centimeters up to 15 centimeters," Hock said, "but it's not global sea level that is that much of a concern.
"It's mostly associated storm surges," she said, which have the potential to cause "a lot more damage."
The disappearance of glaciers will also have an impact on water resources because they provide freshwater for some two billion people.
"The glaciers compensate for the loss of water in summer when it's not raining much and it's hot," Hock said.
The study's projections, which are more pessimistic than those of UN climate experts, were reached through observations of the mass of each glacier through the decades and computer simulations.
Despite the alarming findings, Hock said "it is possible to reduce the mass loss by human action.
"If it happens is of course a different question," she said. "If that happens is of course up to the policy makers."
Ch.Lefebvre--CPN