-
S.African women runners arm themselves after string of killings
-
Nepal tunnel survivor wants to help post-flood rebuild
-
Indonesia fires threatens critically-endangered orangutan: IUCN
-
TikTok agrees to teen limits in US settlement following Meta
-
Iran proposes Hormuz plan, Trump reportedly refuses
-
Venezuela's oil cradle pins hopes on US energy deals
-
El Nino rewrites the menu in the world's top restaurants
-
Lula bans sports betting days ahead of Brazil's election
-
Jay-Z rape accuser says she made 'false accusations'
-
Spotting AI writing: how reliable are the detectors?
-
Trump's photo of Xi greeting carries signs of AI
-
US court refuses to overturn Pentagon ban on Anthropic
-
First US trial against TikTok to open Monday
-
South Lebanon children return to school destroyed by Israel strike
-
French literary prize removes novel from longlist after AI claims
-
European stock markets climb as oil prices drop
-
Trump accuser E. Jean Carroll finally has her damages
-
Asian markets mixed after recent oil surge
-
Heavy fighting, internet disruption as Ethiopia conflict rages
-
Cash for nature protection: hotelier's offer to Principe islanders
-
Asian markets mixed after oil gains
-
India rape cases turn focus back onto women's safety
-
UN approves resolution on dealing with rising sea levels
-
Rich nations should foot climate bill, says Nepal minister
-
Global stocks mostly fall as oil prices and bond yields rise
-
Italy bans burqas in schools, caps numbers of foreign students per class
-
Starbucks to close 250 more cafes in North America
-
Napoli hoping to build new stadium, says owner
-
Stocks fall as oil prices rise and bonds back under pressure
-
What happens if the US bans diesel exports
-
Top ECB official to resign to take up IMF role
-
Oscar-winner Cotillard fears being moved by AI actor
-
Eviction of pensioner puts Spain housing crisis in spotlight
-
Stocks fall, oil prices rise as global bonds back under pressure
-
Average EU diesel price hits record 2.23 euros a litre: AFP analysis
-
Streamex Converts Interest Into Capital as GLDY Investment Strategy Secures $1M+ Institutional Allocation
-
Whitetip Investments Marks 10 Years of Regulation, Transparency & Responsible Trading
-
STARTRADER Named Best Fintech Forex Broker at Forex Expo Dubai 2026
-
Stocks fall, oil prices rise as global bonds under pressure
-
German think tanks urge Merz to stick with reforms after election defeats
-
Hungary detects invasive spotted lanternfly for first time in EU
-
France's top-selling newspaper to slash jobs
-
Forex Expo Dubai 2026 Breaks Guinness World Record Again With 23,816 Attendees
-
BaazEX Enters the Asian Trading Market With a New Approach to Online Forex Trading.
-
Asian markets fall on US-China jitters as leaders meet
-
Sao Tome voters want to stop exodus of 'neglected' youth
-
As Moscow steps up attacks, Kyiv residents brace for harsh winter
-
Mexican cartels target Australia with their African meth
-
Markets mixed as China's Xi arrives for US talks
-
Rapper-turned-PM faces first big test after Nepal disaster
ICJ sides with E.Guinea in spat with Gabon over oil-rich islands
The top United Nations court on Monday sided with Equatorial Guinea in a decades-long dispute with Gabon over three tiny islands in potentially oil-rich waters.
The two west African nations have been squabbling over the 30-hectare (74-acre) island of Mbanie and two smaller low-lying islets, Cocotiers and Conga, since the early 1970s.
The islands themselves are tiny and virtually uninhabited but lie in an area potentially rich in oil and gas.
The dispute dates all the way back to 1900, when then colonial powers France and Spain signed a treaty in Paris setting out the borders between the two countries.
But Gabon argued that a later treaty, the 1974 Bata Convention, then fixed the islands' sovereignty in their favour.
However, the International Court of Justice ruled that the Bata Convention "invoked by the Gabonese Republic is not a treaty having the force of law... and does not constitute a legal title."
It said that the legal title to the islands was held by Spain, which then passed to Equatorial Guinea upon independence in 1968.
Unlike most countries appearing before the ICJ in The Hague, which rules in disputes between states, Guinea and Equatorial Guinea agreed to ask judges for a ruling in an effort to find an amical solution.
The two countries asked the court to decide which legal texts are valid -- the Paris Treaty of 1900 or the Bata Convention of 1974.
In hearings in October, Equatorial Guinea argued that Gabon invaded the islands in 1972 and had occupied them illegally ever since.
Lawyers for the country rubbished the Bata Convention in the October hearings, saying Gabon suddenly produced the document in 2003, surprising everyone.
"No one had seen or heard of this supposed convention," Domingo Mba Esono, Vice-Minister of Mines and Hydrocarbons from Equatorial Guinea, told ICJ judges.
"Moreover, the document presented was not an original but was only an unauthenticated photocopy," said Esono.
Philippe Sands, a lawyer representing Equatorial Guinea, dismissed the Bata Convention as "scraps of paper".
"You are being asked to rule that a state can rely on a photocopy of a photocopy of a purported document, the original of which cannot be found and of which no mention was made or any reliance placed for three decades," said Sands.
Equatorial Guinea has been asking for an original copy of the Bata Convention since 2003, so far in vain.
- 'Badly managed' -
But Marie-Madeleine Mborantsuo, honorary president of Gabon's constitutional court, argued that the Bata Convention "resolves all sovereignty issues regarding the islands and border delimitation".
She admitted that "sadly, neither of the two parties can find the original document", noting it was drawn up in an era before computers and databases.
"Archives were badly managed because of a number of things -- unfavourable climate, a lack of trained personnel and lack of technology," said Mborantsuo.
The court ruled that neither country seemed to regard the Bata Convention as binding upon them, meaning the court did not consider it the correct title in force.
Y.Jeong--CPN