-
Kenya's economy faces climate change risks: World Bank
-
EU to help reopen blocked oil pipeline in Ukraine
-
Cash handouts, fare hikes as Philippines battles soaring fuel costs
-
Indonesia weighs response to price pressures from Middle East war
-
In Hollywood, AI's no match for creativity, say top executives
-
Nvidia chief expects revenue of $1 trillion through 2027
-
Nvidia making AI module for outer space
-
Migrant workers bear brunt of Iran attacks in Gulf
-
Trump vows to 'take' Cuba as island reels from oil embargo
-
Equities rise on oil easing, with focus on Iran war and central banks
-
Nvidia rides 'claw' craze with AI agent platform
-
Damaged Russian tanker has 700 tonnes of fuel on board: Moscow
-
Talks towards international panel to tackle 'inequality emergency' begin at UN
-
EU talks energy as oil price soars
-
Swiss government rejects proposal to limit immigration
-
Ingredients of life discovered in Ryugu asteroid samples
-
Why Iranian drones are hard to stop
-
France threatens to block funds for India over climate inaction
-
"So proud": Irish hometown hails Oscar winner Jessie Buckley
-
European bank battle heats up as UniCredit swoops for Commerzbank
-
Italian bank UniCredit makes bid for Germany's Commerzbank
-
AI to drive growth despite geopolitics, Taiwan's Foxconn says
-
Filipinas seek abortions online in largely Catholic nation
-
'One Battle After Another' wins best picture Oscar
-
South Koreans bask in Oscars triumph for 'KPop Demon Hunters'
-
'One Battle After Another' dominates Oscars
-
Norway's Oscar winner 'Sentimental Value': a failing father seeks redemption
-
Indonesia firms in palm oil fraud probe supplied fuel majors
-
Milan-Cortina Paralympics end as a 'beacon of unity'
-
It's 'Sinners' vs 'One Battle' as Oscars day arrives
-
Oscars night: latest developments
-
US Fed expected to hold rates steady as Iran war roils outlook
-
It's 'Sinners' v 'One Battle' as Oscars day arrives
-
US mayors push back against data center boom as AI backlash grows
-
Who covers AI business blunders? Some insurers cautiously step up
-
Election campaign deepens Congo's generational divide
-
Courchevel super-G cancelled due to snow and fog
-
Middle East turmoil revives Norway push for Arctic drilling
-
Iran, US threaten attacks on oil facilities
-
Oscars: the 10 nominees for best picture
-
Spielberg defends ballet, opera after Chalamet snub
-
Kharg Island bombed, Trump says US to escort ships through Hormuz soon
-
Jurors mull evidence in social media addiction trial
-
UK govt warns petrol retailers against 'unfair practices' during Iran war
-
Mideast war cuts Hormuz strait transit to 77 ships: maritime data firm
-
How will US oil sanctions waiver help Russia?
-
Oil stays above $100, stocks slide tracking Mideast war
-
How Iranians are communicating through internet blackout
-
Global shipping industry caught in storm of war
-
Why is the dollar profiting from Middle East war?
How world's most precise clock could transform fundamental physics
US scientists have measured Albert Einstein's theory of general relativity -- which holds that gravity slows time down -- at the smallest scale ever, demonstrating that clocks tick at different rates when separated by fractions of a millimeter.
Jun Ye, of the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) and the University of Colorado Boulder, told AFP it was "by far" the most precise clock ever built -- and could pave the way for new discoveries in quantum mechanics, the rulebook for the subatomic world.
Ye and colleagues published their findings in the prestigious journal Nature on Wednesday, describing the engineering advances that enabled them to build a device 50 times more precise than their previous best clock, itself a record-breaker, built in 2010.
It was more than a century ago, in 1915, that Einstein put forward his theory of general relativity, which held that the gravitational field of a massive object distorts space-time.
This causes time to move more slowly as one approaches closer to the object.
But it wasn't until the invention of atomic clocks -- which keep time by detecting the transition between two energy states inside an atom exposed to a particular frequency -- that scientists could prove the theory.
Early experiments included the Gravity Probe A of 1976, which involved a spacecraft six thousand miles (10,000 kilometers) above Earth's surface and showed that an onboard clock was faster than an equivalent on Earth by one second every 73 years.
Since then, clocks have become more and more precise, and thus better able to detect the effects of relativity.
A decade ago, Ye's team set a record by observing time moving at different rates when their clock was moved 33 centimeters (just over a foot) higher.
- Theory of everything -
Ye's key breakthrough was working with webs of light, known as optical lattices, to trap atoms in orderly arrangements. This is to stop the atoms from falling due to gravity or otherwise moving, resulting in a loss of accuracy.
Inside Ye’s new clock are 100,000 strontium atoms, layered on top of each other like a stack of pancakes, in total about a millimeter high.
The clock is so precise that when the scientists divided the stack into two, they could detect differences in time in the top and bottom halves.
At this level of accuracy, clocks essentially act as sensors.
"Space and time are connected," said Ye. "And with time measurement so precise, you can actually see how space is changing in real time -- Earth is a lively, living body."
Such clocks spread out over a volcanically-active region could tell geologists the difference between solid rock and lava, helping predict eruptions.
Or, for example, study how global warming is causing glaciers to melt and oceans to rise.
What excites Ye most, however, is how future clocks could usher in a completely new realm of physics.
The current clock can detect time differences across 200 microns -- but if that was brought down to 20 microns, it could start to probe the quantum world, helping bridge gaps in theory.
While relativity beautifully explains how large objects like planets and galaxies behave, it is famously incompatible with quantum mechanics, which deals with the very small, and holds that everything can behave like a particle and a wave.
The intersection of the two fields would bring physics a step closer to a unifying "theory of everything" that explains all physical phenomena of the cosmos.
A.Levy--CPN