-
Kenya's economy faces climate change risks: World Bank
-
AI rivalry overshadows push for guardrails at Xi-Trump talks: experts
-
Asian stocks fall on US-Iran impasse, AI setbacks
-
'I applied to be pope': Losing grip on reality while using ChatGPT
-
EU to ease train travel with one journey, one ticket rules
-
Paramount defends Warner bid amid California probe
-
Favourites Finland, Israel through at Eurovision semis
-
Musk 'wanted 90%' of OpenAI, Altman tells tech titan trial
-
Oil prices advance, stocks mostly fall on US-Iran deadlock
-
Musk 'wanted 90%' of OpenAI, Altman says in high-stakes trial
-
US appeals court halts order declaring Trump's global 10% tariff illegal
-
Showtime as boycotted Eurovision kicks off
-
Kevin Warsh returns to Federal Reserve with 'regime change' agenda
-
Fabled Argentine city Ushuaia tries to shrug off virus suspicions
-
US Senate confirms Trump-nominee Warsh to Federal Reserve board
-
Wine consumption slides in 2025
-
Trump due in China for superpower summit with Xi
-
Sam Altman to testify at California tech titan trial
-
US consumer inflation hits three-year high fuelled by Iran war
-
Cannes honours Jackson, Middle Earth wizard who 'transformed' cinema
-
Oil prices jump, stocks retreat on US-Iran deadlock
-
South Korea official floats AI profit social tax as tech giants boom
-
Vodafone sees signs of recovery amid turnaround plan
-
Bayer profit up but glyphosate sales struggle
-
New London museum woos younger visitors
-
Japan crisp packs to go colourless due to Iran war crunch
-
'Genuine urgency': China's underlying concerns at the Xi-Trump talks
-
Oil climbs on US-Iran deadlock, Seoul falls on calls for AI social tax
-
Bayer profit up on seed business but glyphosate sales struggle
-
Israel takes the stage in semis of boycotted Eurovision
-
Antarctic talks in Japan: key things to know
-
Thyssenkrupp cuts sales outlook on Mideast war
-
South Korea floats AI profit social tax as tech giants boom
-
What if we killed all mosquitoes?
-
Oil climbs but markets shrug off US-Iran deadlock
-
After backlash, Mexico cancels plan to cut school year for World Cup
-
Redington MD and Group CEO V.S. Hariharan Appointed to GTDC Executive Committee
-
MD-11, aircraft in fatal crash, cleared for US flight once more
-
Microsoft boss 'proud' of profit-making OpenAI investment
-
Indie series 'Everyone Is Doing Great' returns... on Netflix
-
Trump warns Mideast truce on 'life support', Iran says ready for any aggression
-
Cannes Film Festival defends male-dominated competition
-
SNC Scandic Coin: Real assets meet digital utility
-
SNC Scandic Coin: реальные активы и цифровые возможности
-
Oil rises, stocks mostly higher on US-Iran deadlock
-
SNC Scandic Coin: поєднання реальних активів та цифрової функціональності
-
Dua Lipa sues Samsung in US over use of her likeness on TV box
-
NATO 'could never be more important than today': Canada FM
-
Boycotters Spain, Ireland, Slovenia will not show Eurovision
-
Oil rises, stocks mixed on US-Iran deadlock
US appeals court halts order declaring Trump's global 10% tariff illegal
A US federal appeals court on Tuesday temporarily paused a ruling declaring President Donald Trump's global 10-percent tariffs illegal, granting a government request to suspend the decision pending appeal.
Trump imposed the temporary 10-percent duty in February, shortly after the Supreme Court struck down many of his global tariffs.
On May 7, the US Court of International Trade (CIT) blocked the tariffs from being implemented against two companies and the state of Washington. That decision was to take effect on Tuesday.
The US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit on Tuesday issued a brief order that included an administrative stay on the CIT's order, setting a schedule for both sides to file briefs on the matter.
In its motion for a stay, the Trump administration argued that the CIT's decision should be stayed pending the full run of government appeals -- up to the Supreme Court, if necessary.
It argued that if it issued refunds on the 10-percent global tariff, only to have an appeals court uphold its position, it would be unable to pursue economic redress.
"Plaintiffs, conversely, can be made whole through refunds, including interest, if the tariffs are ultimately held unlawful and refundable," the government said.
The court, however, only granted an administrative stay for the period while the court considers the motions for a stay pending appeal.
- Signature policy upended -
The Trump administration has said the new tariff was meant to deal with balance-of-payments deficits, citing Section 122 of the Trade Act of 1974.
The 10-percent global tariff under Section 122 is valid until late July unless extended by Congress.
The Trump administration has also been pursuing other means to impose tariffs to replace those struck down by the Supreme Court.
US authorities have opened investigations into dozens of trading partners over forced labor and overcapacity allegations -- which could lead to fresh tariffs or other action.
Trump's sector-specific tariffs on goods like steel, aluminum and autos remain unaffected by these legal challenges.
The Supreme Court's striking down of the majority of Trump's tariffs was a blow to the Republican president, after he made the levies a signature economic policy.
Since the decision, businesses have rushed for refunds.
US Customs and Border Protection (CBP) estimated in March that more than 330,000 importers could be eligible for refunds after the Supreme Court's decision.
The tariffs that were struck down earlier, imposed under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA), collected approximately $166 billion in duties and estimated deposits.
On Tuesday, CNBC reported that businesses had begun to receive refunds, in line with a CBP timeline released earlier this month.
CBP did not immediately respond to an AFP request for comment.
Y.Jeong--CPN