-
Kenya's economy faces climate change risks: World Bank
-
US Fed expected to hold rates steady as Iran war roils outlook
-
It's 'Sinners' v 'One Battle' as Oscars day arrives
-
US mayors push back against data center boom as AI backlash grows
-
Who covers AI business blunders? Some insurers cautiously step up
-
Election campaign deepens Congo's generational divide
-
Courchevel super-G cancelled due to snow and fog
-
Middle East turmoil revives Norway push for Arctic drilling
-
Iran, US threaten attacks on oil facilities
-
Oscars: the 10 nominees for best picture
-
Spielberg defends ballet, opera after Chalamet snub
-
Kharg Island bombed, Trump says US to escort ships through Hormuz soon
-
Jurors mull evidence in social media addiction trial
-
UK govt warns petrol retailers against 'unfair practices' during Iran war
-
Mideast war cuts Hormuz strait transit to 77 ships: maritime data firm
-
How will US oil sanctions waiver help Russia?
-
Oil stays above $100, stocks slide tracking Mideast war
-
How Iranians are communicating through internet blackout
-
Global shipping industry caught in storm of war
-
Why is the dollar profiting from Middle East war?
-
Oil dips under $100, stocks back in green tracking Mideast war
-
US Fed's preferred inflation gauge edges down
-
Deadly blast rocks Iran as leaders attend rally in show of defiance
-
Moscow pushes US to ease more oil sanctions
-
AI agent 'lobster fever' grips China despite risks
-
Thousands of Chinese boats mass at sea, raising questions
-
Casting directors finally get their due at Oscars
-
Fantastic Mr Stowaway: fox sails from Britain to New York port
-
US jury to begin deliberations in social media addiction trial
-
NASA says 'on track' for Artemis 2 launch as soon as April 1
-
Valentino mixes 80s and Baroque splendour on Rome return
-
Dating app Tinder dabbles with AI matchmaking
-
Scavenging ravens memorize vast tracts of wolf hunting grounds: study
-
Top US, China economy officials to meet for talks in Paris
-
Chile's Smiljan Radic Clarke wins Pritzker architecture prize
-
Lufthansa flights axed as pilots walk out
-
Oil tops $100 as fresh Iran attacks offset stockpiles release
-
US military 'not ready' to escort tankers through Hormuz Strait: energy secretary
-
WWII leader Churchill to be removed from UK banknotes
-
EU vows to 'respond firmly' to any trade pact breach by US
-
'Punished' for university: debt-laden UK graduates urge reform
-
Mideast war to brake German recovery: institute
-
China-North Korea train arrives in Pyongyang after 6-year halt
-
Businessman or politician? Billionaire Czech PM under fire again
-
Lost page of legendary Archimedes palimpsest found in France
-
Cathay Pacific roughly doubles fuel surcharge on most routes
-
BMW profit holds up despite Trump tariffs, China woes
-
Electric vehicle rethink to cost Honda almost $16 billion
-
From Kyiv to UK, Ukrainian drone production spans Europe
-
Australia to change fuel quality standards to boost supply
EU proposes new delay to anti-deforestation rules
The EU said Tuesday it will seek a new one-year delay to sweeping anti-deforestation rules cheered by green groups but assailed by key trading partners from the United States to Indonesia.
The bill, which bans imports of products driving deforestation, is currently set to take effect at the end this year, but the European Commission said the supporting system was not ready.
It would be the second postponement on implementing the law, which was passed in 2023 and was originally due to take effect in late 2024, before being delayed to late 2025.
"We have concluded that we cannot meet the original deadline without causing disruptions to our businesses and supply chains," commission spokesman Olof Gill told a press conference in Brussels.
The European Union executive will as a result push to delay the law's entry into force by one more year, to late 2026, he added. The postponement has to be approved by member states and the European Parliament.
The move is set to bring renewed scrutiny to the EU's commitment to a greener future, which has come under increased pressure from governments and industry over the past year.
It came hours after the commission struck a free-trade deal with Indonesia, a prominent critic of the law -- although environment commissioner Jessika Roswall said the two developments were "not linked at all".
The deforestation law was hailed by environmental groups when it was adopted as a major breakthrough in the fight to protect nature and combat climate change.
It prohibits a vast range of goods -- from coffee to cocoa, soy, timber, palm oil, cattle, printing paper and rubber -- if produced using land that was deforested after December 2020.
Firms importing the merchandise in question to the 27-nation EU will be responsible for tracking their supply chains to prove goods did not originate from deforested zones, relying on geolocation and satellite data.
But the ban has faced opposition from trading partners, including Brazil and the United States, and some EU capitals, amid concerns over red tape, costs and lack of clarity over some aspects of the law.
Partially because of this, its entry into force was pushed back by 12 months a first time in 2024.
- 'Wider battle' -
The commission said the new delay had to do with "serious capacity concerns regarding the IT system" designed to support implementation of the rules, saying more time was needed to get it running smoothly.
"Given the projected load, the Commission will therefore seek a postponement... in order to avoid uncertainty for authorities and to avoid operational difficulties for companies," Gill said.
The push comes as climate has increasingly taken a back seat in Brussels, with global trade tensions and the war in Ukraine shifting the focus to industry and defence -- something that was not lost on green groups.
"This is part of a wider battle: between those who want to protect the natural world and the life systems which depend on it, and those intent on destroying it, often driven by narrow self-interest," said Nicole Polsterer, of environmental group Fern.
"Every day this law is delayed equates to more forests razed, more wildfires and more extreme weather."
Critics of the law say it imposes an excessively heavy administrative burden on farmers and companies.
But WWF, another environmental group, said a new delay would lead to "massive stranded costs" for all firms that had already invested in complying with the new rules.
"If this technical issue is real, this shows not only incompetence, but also a clear lack of political will to invest sufficiently in a timely implementation," said Anke Schulmeister-Oldenhove, WWF's forest policy manager.
X.Wong--CPN