Coin Press - Cuba Strangled by US Pressure


Cuba Strangled by US Pressure




The island nation of Cuba is facing its most severe economic crisis in decades. Recent months have seen a perfect storm of external pressure and internal fragility. The United States has tightened long‑standing sanctions and, through a combination of executive orders and diplomatic threats, has targeted the two pillars that have kept the Caribbean country afloat: imported oil and tourism. As fuel shortages deepen, blackouts become routine and visitors stay away, many Cubans are comparing the present hardship to the “Special Period” of the 1990s. This article examines how the latest U.S. measures are choking the Cuban government, the social and economic repercussions on the population, and the responses from Havana and the broader international community.

Washington’s New Offensive
In late January 2026, the U.S. president declared a national emergency regarding Cuba and signed a sweeping executive order that uses tariffs as a weapon against any country that supplies the island with oil. The order empowers the State and Commerce Departments to designate countries that provide fuel to Cuba and allows the White House to raise duties on unrelated imports from those nations. The U.S. administration claims the move is necessary because Havana allegedly supports hostile governments and armed groups, hosts foreign intelligence facilities and engages in human rights abuses. While the order has not yet been fully implemented, it has already sown uncertainty among Cuba’s remaining fuel suppliers, most notably Mexico and Russia.

This tariff threat comes on the heels of a dramatic U.S. military operation. On 3 January 2026 elite U.S. forces captured Venezuelan President Nicolás Maduro and his wife and flew them to a U.S. naval vessel. Venezuela had been Cuba’s closest ally and its main oil supplier for two decades. The operation severed that lifeline overnight. Mexico, which filled the void by shipping nearly 20,000 barrels of oil per day in 2025, paused deliveries in late January as it weighed the risk of U.S. retaliation. With Venezuela offline and Mexico hesitant, Cuba now depends on small shipments from Russia and Algeria, leaving it with only a few weeks of fuel reserves.

Energy Shortages and Tourism Collapse
Fuel scarcity has transformed daily life across Cuba. Rolling blackouts lasting several hours have become common even in the capital, Havana. Public transportation is grinding to a halt as buses and shared taxis run out of diesel, forcing people to walk long distances or hitch rides. Businesses and hospitals struggle to operate without reliable electricity and fuel. The government produces only about 40 % of its energy domestically, making imported oil essential to power the grid, irrigate crops and keep factories running.

The fuel crisis has compounded an already steep decline in tourism, once a $3 billion annual industry for Cuba. Visitor numbers plunged from 4.8 million in 2018 to roughly 2.3 million between January and November 2025. Sanctions enacted over the past five years—including bans on cruise ships and restrictions on flights—had already deterred many travelers. The collapse of Venezuela’s oil shipments and the global pandemic worsened the situation, but the current blockade threatens to bring the sector to a standstill. Drivers of classic cars in Havana report that they now receive only one or two customers a day and have cut their prices by more than half to attract business. Sightseeing buses that once shuttled crowds around the capital now leave nearly empty.

People who make a living from tourism are among those suffering most. Street vendors of snacks such as chivirico—deep‑fried flour sprinkled with sugar—have seen sales plummet as visitor numbers drop and locals have less disposable income. Small businesses, including guesthouses and restaurants that mushroomed during Cuba’s brief tourism boom, are closing their doors. The exodus of tourists also means fewer euros and dollars in circulation, exacerbating the island’s currency shortages.

Humanitarian Alarm
International observers warn that the energy squeeze could lead to a humanitarian catastrophe. The secretary‑general of the United Nations urged all parties to seek dialogue and respect international law, warning that Cuba’s situation will “worsen if not collapse” if its fuel needs are not met. The UN noted that the General Assembly has repeatedly called for an end to the U.S. trade embargo and reminded Washington of its obligations under international law.

The U.S. government dismisses these warnings and says the humanitarian crisis is the result of Havana’s mismanagement rather than sanctions. Washington has announced an additional $6 million in aid to be delivered through the Catholic Church, bringing the total U.S. assistance since last year’s Hurricane Melissa to $9 million. Cuban officials deride the aid as hypocrisy, saying it is impossible to provide “soup & cans for a few” while denying the country access to fuel.

Cuba’s Response
Faced with dwindling oil supplies, Cuba has unveiled a sweeping rationing plan designed to protect essential services. Government ministers say fuel will be guaranteed for sectors such as agriculture, healthcare, water supply, education and defence. Tourism and export industries, including the famous cigar sector, will also receive priority to generate foreign currency. Domestic and international flights are expected to continue for now, though drivers will see restrictions at petrol stations until supplies normalise.

Officials have also announced plans to plant 200,000 hectares of rice and expand renewable energy and animal traction to offset the lack of fuel for irrigation and ploughing. Schools have been told to adopt a hybrid system combining in‑person and remote learning to save energy. The government’s message is resolute: “We are not going to collapse,” said Commerce Minister Oscar Perez‑Oliva.

President Miguel Díaz‑Canel has called for solidarity and resilience. In public remarks he compared the current crisis to the 1990s and urged Cubans to prepare for “further sacrifices”. He criticised Washington’s measures as “fascist, criminal and genocidal” and declared that the United States had hijacked its own citizens’ interests for personal gain. Cuba’s foreign minister described the U.S. actions as an “unusual and extraordinary threat” and announced that Havana was declaring an international emergency.

Public Mood
On the streets of Havana, the mood swings between anger and resignation. Some residents liken the situation to war and say the only thing missing is bombing. Many recall the Special Period following the collapse of the Soviet Union, when oxen replaced tractors and power cuts were the norm. Elderly Cubans who lived through that era say today’s shortages of fuel, food and medicine feel worse. Younger adults, who have never known anything but economic crisis, are nonetheless shocked by how quickly buses have disappeared and fuel lines have lengthened.

Workers in essential services worry about the impact on vulnerable populations. Parents wonder how to keep schools open without electricity; farmers ask how to till soil without fuel; hospital administrators scramble to secure diesel for generators. Some are already walking long distances to work or using bicycle taxis. A growing number of people say they feel trapped: they cannot afford to leave the country, yet staying means enduring increasingly harsh conditions.

Regional and Global Implications
The U.S. offensive against Cuba’s oil suppliers has unsettled relations across Latin America. Mexico, currently negotiating a trade agreement with Washington, is caught between its solidarity with Havana and the risk of damaging its own economy. Mexican officials say they are using all diplomatic channels to find a way to continue supplying oil without triggering U.S. tariffs. Russia has hinted that it will continue sending oil despite the sanctions, viewing the standoff as another front in its broader confrontation with the West. Analysts caution that the U.S. tariff framework could extend far beyond energy producers, disrupting supply chains for a wide range of goods.

For the Cuban government, the stakes are existential. Oil and tourism provide the foreign currency that allows the state to import food, medicine and spare parts. Without them, the economy could collapse and social unrest could intensify. U.S. officials hope that financial pain will force Havana to negotiate or trigger internal change, while Cuban leaders argue that the measures are a form of collective punishment designed to topple their system without regard for human suffering. The coming months will reveal whether Washington’s strategy succeeds in forcing concessions or whether it pushes Cuba to deepen ties with other powers.

Conclusion and Future
By targeting fuel supplies and tourism, the United States has opened a new chapter in its decades‑long confrontation with Cuba. The measures have already plunged the island into deeper crisis, leaving millions to grapple with blackouts, empty streets and an uncertain future. Whether the strategy will weaken the government in Havana or merely inflict greater hardship on ordinary Cubans remains to be seen. What is clear is that, in the absence of oil and visitors, the Cuban economy cannot function as it has for the past thirty years. As the world watches, Cuba must once again summon resilience and ingenuity to survive another period of scarcity.



Featured


Long live Ukraine - Хай живе Україна - Да здравствует Украина

Es lebe die Ukraine - Да здравствует Украина - Long live Ukraine - Хай живе Україна - Nech žije Ukrajina - Länge leve Ukraina - תחי אוקראינה - Lang leve Oekraïne - Да живее Украйна - Elagu Ukraina - Kauan eläköön Ukraina - Vive l'Ukraine - Ζήτω η Ουκρανία - 乌克兰万岁 - Viva Ucrania - Ať žije Ukrajina - Çok yaşa Ukrayna - Viva a Ucrânia - Trăiască Ucraina - ウクライナ万歳 - Tegyvuoja Ukraina - Lai dzīvo Ukraina - Viva l'Ucraina - Hidup Ukraina - تحيا أوكرانيا - Vivat Ucraina - ขอให้ยูเครนจงเจริญ - Ucraina muôn năm - ژوندی دی وی اوکراین - Yashasin Ukraina - Озак яшә Украина - Živjela Ukrajina - 우크라이나 만세 - Mabuhay ang Ukraine - Lenge leve Ukraina - Nyob ntev Ukraine - Да живее Украина - გაუმარჯოს უკრაინას - Hidup Ukraine - Vivu Ukrainio - Længe leve Ukraine - Živjela Ukrajina - Жыве Украіна - Yaşasın Ukrayna - Lengi lifi Úkraína - Lank lewe die Oekraïne

Stargate project, Trump and the AI war...

In a dramatic return to the global political stage, former President Donald J. Trump, as the current 47th President of the United States of America, has unveiled his latest initiative, the so-called ‘Stargate Project,’ in a bid to cement the United States’ dominance in artificial intelligence and outpace China’s meteoric rise in the field. The newly announced programme, cloaked in patriotic rhetoric and ambitious targets, is already stirring intense debate over the future of technological competition between the world’s two largest economies.According to preliminary statements from Trump’s team, the Stargate Project will consolidate the efforts of leading American tech conglomerates, defence contractors, and research universities under a centralised framework. The former president, who has long championed American exceptionalism, claims this approach will provide the United States with a decisive advantage, enabling rapid breakthroughs in cutting-edge AI applications ranging from military strategy to commercial innovation.“America must remain the global leader in technology—no ifs, no buts,” Trump declared at a recent press conference. “China has been trying to surpass us in AI, but with this new project, we will make sure the future remains ours.”Details regarding funding and governance remain scarce, but early indications suggest the initiative will rely heavily on public-private partnerships, tax incentives for research and development, and collaboration with high-profile venture capital firms. Skeptics, however, warn that the endeavour could fan the flames of an increasingly militarised AI race, raising ethical concerns about surveillance, automation of warfare, and data privacy. Critics also question whether the initiative can deliver on its lofty promises, especially in the face of existing economic and geopolitical pressures.Yet for its supporters, the Stargate Project serves as a rallying cry for renewed American leadership and an antidote to worries over China’s technological ascendancy. Proponents argue that accelerating AI research is paramount if the United States wishes to preserve not just military supremacy, but also the economic and cultural influence that has typified its global role for decades.Whether this bold project will succeed—or if it will devolve into a symbolic gesture—remains to be seen. What is certain, however, is that the Stargate Project has already reignited debate about how best to safeguard America’s strategic future and maintain the balance of power in the fast-evolving arena of artificial intelligence.

Ukraine sends ground robots

Ukraine is putting ground robots to work on a scale that is beginning to change how its army supplies positions, evacuates casualties and conducts some of its most dangerous combat missions. The significance lies in the gradual transfer of battlefield exposure from people to machines. For a force under sustained pressure to preserve experienced soldiers, that change could matter well beyond the individual missions captured on video.The expansion is measurable. By early September 2026, Ukraine’s DELTA battlefield management system had recorded approximately 112,000 logistics and evacuation missions by ground robotic systems since the start of the year. The monthly total rose from 7,511 in January to 25,143 in August, an increase of roughly 3.3 times. These figures describe missions, not the number of robots deployed, and they should not be read as a tally of successful attacks or lives saved. They nevertheless show how far the technology has moved into routine military activity.Supply work explains much of its value. Ammunition, food and water still have to reach troops in positions exposed to surveillance and attack. Wounded soldiers still have to be brought out. A remotely operated vehicle can undertake part of that movement while its operator remains elsewhere. The load may be ordinary; the route is what makes the task dangerous. Repeated across many positions, reducing the number of journeys made by people can alter the daily burden on an infantry force.The strongest case for a robot is often the journey it allows a soldier to avoid. That changes the economics of military equipment. The purchase price matters, but so do the consequences of losing it. A destroyed machine consumes production capacity and money. A lost soldier also removes training, experience and relationships that cannot be replaced on a factory schedule. This is why an apparently modest cargo platform can have greater practical importance than a more spectacular experimental weapon.Combat applications are developing alongside that logistical role. Ukraine’s Third Army Corps includes NC13, a unit specialising in ground robotic operations. In September, corps commander Andrii Biletskyi described an ambition to replace around a third of the corps’ frontline personnel with robots by the end of the year. That remains an objective for a particular formation, rather than a demonstrated reduction across the Ukrainian army. It signals how seriously some commanders now regard the technology.There is a longer history behind the sudden attention. In December 2024, the Khartiia Brigade used a coordinated force of aerial drones and ground robots in an assault near Hlyboke in the Kharkiv region. More than 50 unmanned systems took part. The operation demonstrated that different remotely operated platforms could be combined for surveillance, fire support and attack. It also exposed the limits: ground conditions disabled some machines, and soldiers were still needed to secure and hold the territory afterwards.Those distinctions remain essential. An unmanned vehicle has no crew aboard; that does not make it an autonomous decision-maker. Remote operation, assistance with navigation and independent target selection are different capabilities. Much of the operational change visible in Ukraine concerns the first of these. Human operators, commanders and technicians remain central to making the equipment useful. Describing every remotely controlled vehicle as an artificial intelligence weapon obscures both its present strengths and its weaknesses.The physical environment imposes constraints that software cannot simply remove. A ground vehicle must negotiate soil, vegetation, rubble and obstacles that an aircraft may pass over. Its camera sees from a low position. Communications can be intermittent, and movement through complex terrain requires information that may be incomplete or already outdated. Research on small military robot teams has long identified the combination of restricted visibility, difficult navigation and unreliable communication as a central challenge. Ukraine is testing those problems under combat conditions.Scaling the fleet therefore requires a larger support system. More vehicles mean more operators to train, more repairs, more replacement components and a greater need to coordinate machines with the soldiers around them. The useful measure is how many tasks can be completed reliably over time. A large delivery of equipment can look impressive while leaving unanswered questions about serviceability, workload and availability after repeated deployments.Nor does removing a crew eliminate risk. Operators still work within a military system exposed to attack, and a machine that fails during an evacuation may leave a casualty in danger. Remote control changes where human vulnerability sits. It does not make the mission consequence-free. Reliability is particularly important when the payload is a wounded person rather than ammunition, and success in one role cannot automatically establish suitability for another.The likely effect on the fighting is therefore uneven. Robotic systems can ease dangerous supply tasks and support selected assaults while remaining poorly suited to others. Their value depends on the terrain, the communications environment and the organisation using them. A successful demonstration offers evidence of a capability; repeated use establishes whether a formation can depend on it.Ukraine’s developing robot force is best understood through that practical test. Can it keep a position supplied with fewer exposed soldiers? Can it bring someone back who would otherwise remain stranded? Can it reduce the personnel required for a dangerous task without creating a greater burden elsewhere? The answers will determine how much battlefield activity can move to machines. For the soldiers still holding the line, those gains are substantial enough without the promise of a war fought without people.