-
Kenya's economy faces climate change risks: World Bank
-
US Fed expected to hold rates steady as Iran war roils outlook
-
It's 'Sinners' v 'One Battle' as Oscars day arrives
-
US mayors push back against data center boom as AI backlash grows
-
Who covers AI business blunders? Some insurers cautiously step up
-
Election campaign deepens Congo's generational divide
-
Courchevel super-G cancelled due to snow and fog
-
Middle East turmoil revives Norway push for Arctic drilling
-
Iran, US threaten attacks on oil facilities
-
Oscars: the 10 nominees for best picture
-
Spielberg defends ballet, opera after Chalamet snub
-
Kharg Island bombed, Trump says US to escort ships through Hormuz soon
-
Jurors mull evidence in social media addiction trial
-
UK govt warns petrol retailers against 'unfair practices' during Iran war
-
Mideast war cuts Hormuz strait transit to 77 ships: maritime data firm
-
How will US oil sanctions waiver help Russia?
-
Oil stays above $100, stocks slide tracking Mideast war
-
How Iranians are communicating through internet blackout
-
Global shipping industry caught in storm of war
-
Why is the dollar profiting from Middle East war?
-
Oil dips under $100, stocks back in green tracking Mideast war
-
US Fed's preferred inflation gauge edges down
-
Deadly blast rocks Iran as leaders attend rally in show of defiance
-
Moscow pushes US to ease more oil sanctions
-
AI agent 'lobster fever' grips China despite risks
-
Thousands of Chinese boats mass at sea, raising questions
-
Casting directors finally get their due at Oscars
-
Fantastic Mr Stowaway: fox sails from Britain to New York port
-
US jury to begin deliberations in social media addiction trial
-
NASA says 'on track' for Artemis 2 launch as soon as April 1
-
Valentino mixes 80s and Baroque splendour on Rome return
-
Dating app Tinder dabbles with AI matchmaking
-
Scavenging ravens memorize vast tracts of wolf hunting grounds: study
-
Top US, China economy officials to meet for talks in Paris
-
Chile's Smiljan Radic Clarke wins Pritzker architecture prize
-
Lufthansa flights axed as pilots walk out
-
Oil tops $100 as fresh Iran attacks offset stockpiles release
-
US military 'not ready' to escort tankers through Hormuz Strait: energy secretary
-
WWII leader Churchill to be removed from UK banknotes
-
EU vows to 'respond firmly' to any trade pact breach by US
-
'Punished' for university: debt-laden UK graduates urge reform
-
Mideast war to brake German recovery: institute
-
China-North Korea train arrives in Pyongyang after 6-year halt
-
Businessman or politician? Billionaire Czech PM under fire again
-
Lost page of legendary Archimedes palimpsest found in France
-
Cathay Pacific roughly doubles fuel surcharge on most routes
-
BMW profit holds up despite Trump tariffs, China woes
-
Electric vehicle rethink to cost Honda almost $16 billion
-
From Kyiv to UK, Ukrainian drone production spans Europe
-
Australia to change fuel quality standards to boost supply
Nobel physics laureate says Trump cuts will 'cripple' US research
It was just past 2:00 am when a mysterious number rang Nobel laureate John Clarke, what he deemed "obviously a joke call" that grew increasingly surreal when he heard "a voice from Sweden."
"It soon became clear that it was real," Clarke told journalists Tuesday after he and two colleagues had won the Nobel Prize in physics for their door-opening work in quantum mechanics.
"I was just sitting there feeling completely stunned," Clarke said. "It had never occurred to me in my entire life that anything like this would ever happen."
The University of California, Berkeley professor said his phone kept ringing, emails began pouring in, and people started "banging on my door" seeking interviews at 3:00 am (1000 GMT).
"I said no thank you, not at this time of night," the British 83-year-old said with a chuckle.
Clarke shared the coveted prize with two fellow physicists who worked in his Berkeley lab at the time of the trio's research, Frenchman Michel Devoret and American John Martinis. All three scientists are researchers at American universities.
The physicist noted the significant resources he was afforded at the time of their work some four decades ago, including lab space, graduate assistants and equipment.
And he called US President Donald Trump's efforts to reshape American science and health policy -- including mass firings to government scientists and steep slashes to research budgets -- an "immensely serious problem."
"This will cripple much of United States science research," he told AFP, adding that he knew people who have taken enormous funding hits.
"It is going to be disastrous if this continues," Clarke said. "Assuming that the present administration finally comes to an end, it may take a decade to get back to where we were, say, half a year ago."
"It's a huge problem" that's "entirely beyond any understanding of anyone who is a scientist," he said.
- 'Basic science' -
Nobel laureate Mary Brunkow, among Monday's winners for medicine, had similarly emphasized to journalists the importance of US public financing to scientific research.
This year's physics laureates carried out their experiments in the 1980s, research that enabled real-world applications of the quantum realm.
Quantum mechanics takes over when things get tiny -- think subatomic -- and the rules of traditional physics no longer apply.
For example, when a normal ball hits a wall, it bounces back. But on the quantum scale, a particle will actually pass straight through a comparable wall -- a phenomenon called "tunneling."
Clarke and his fellow winners demonstrated tunneling on a scale the public can grasp.
As the Nobel committee put it, their work showed "the bizarre properties of the quantum world can be made concrete in a system big enough to be held in the hand."
That research made possible technologies like the cell phone, and also proved foundational in the race to develop powerful quantum computers.
Clarke noted Tuesday that it is "vital" to keep conducting -- and funding -- work that might seem like "basic science" but results in "crucial applications" down the line.
"Michel and John and I had no way of understanding the importance" their work would have, he said.
"If you'd asked us 40 years ago, we would have said, 'Well yeah, it's an interesting thing.'"
He emphasized that researchers who lay the groundwork "are not that people who actually use that effect to do something that is vitally important."
"It's so important to do this basic science, because you don't know what the outcome is going to be."
C.Peyronnet--CPN