-
Kenya's economy faces climate change risks: World Bank
-
Penguins queue in Paris zoo for their bird flu jabs
-
Sri Lanka issues fresh landslide warnings as toll nears 500
-
Stocks, dollar rise before key US inflation data
-
After wins abroad, Syria leader must gain trust at home
-
Markets rise ahead of US data, expected Fed rate cut
-
German factory orders rise more than expected
-
Flooding kills two as Vietnam hit by dozens of landslides
-
Italy to open Europe's first marine sanctuary for dolphins
-
Hong Kong university suspends student union after calls for fire justice
-
Asian markets rise ahead of US data, expected Fed rate cut
-
Georgia's street dogs stir affection, fear, national debate
-
Pandas and ping-pong: Macron ending China visit on lighter note
-
TikTok to comply with 'upsetting' Australian under-16 ban
-
Pentagon endorses Australia submarine pact
-
Softbank's Son says super AI could make humans like fish, win Nobel Prize
-
OpenAI strikes deal on US$4.6 bn AI centre in Australia
-
Rains hamper Sri Lanka cleanup after deadly floods
-
Unchecked mining waste taints DR Congo communities
-
Asian markets mixed ahead of US data, expected Fed rate cut
-
French almond makers revive traditions to counter US dominance
-
Aid cuts causing 'tragic' rise in child deaths, Bill Gates tells AFP
-
Abortion in Afghanistan: 'My mother crushed my stomach with a stone'
-
Mixed day for US equities as Japan's Nikkei rallies
-
To counter climate denial, UN scientists must be 'clear' about human role: IPCC chief
-
Facebook 'supreme court' admits 'frustrations' in 5 years of work
-
South Africa says wants equal treatment, after US G20 exclusion
-
One in three French Muslims say suffer discrimination: report
-
Microsoft faces complaint in EU over Israeli surveillance data
-
Milan-Cortina organisers rush to ready venues as Olympic flame arrives in Italy
-
Truth commission urges Finland to rectify Sami injustices
-
Stocks rise eyeing series of US rate cuts
-
Italy sweatshop probe snares more luxury brands
-
EU hits Meta with antitrust probe over WhatsApp AI features
-
Russia's Putin heads to India for defence, trade talks
-
South Africa telecoms giant Vodacom to take control of Kenya's Safaricom
-
Markets mixed as traders struggle to hold Fed cut rally
-
Asian markets mixed as traders struggle to hold Fed cut rally
-
In Turkey, ancient carved faces shed new light on Neolithic society
-
Asian markets stumble as traders struggle to hold Fed cut rally
-
Nintendo launches long-awaited 'Metroid Prime 4' sci-fi blaster
-
Trump scraps Biden's fuel-economy standards, sparking climate outcry
-
US stocks rise as weak jobs data boosts rate cut odds
-
Poor hiring data points to US economic weakness
-
Germany to host 2029 women's Euros
-
Satellite surge threatens space telescopes, astronomers warn
-
Greek govt warns farmers not to escalate subsidy protest
-
EU agrees deal to ban Russian gas by end of 2027
-
Former king's memoirs hits bookstores in Spain
-
German lithium project moves ahead in boost for Europe's EV sector
Nobel physics laureate says Trump cuts will 'cripple' US research
It was just past 2:00 am when a mysterious number rang Nobel laureate John Clarke, what he deemed "obviously a joke call" that grew increasingly surreal when he heard "a voice from Sweden."
"It soon became clear that it was real," Clarke told journalists Tuesday after he and two colleagues had won the Nobel Prize in physics for their door-opening work in quantum mechanics.
"I was just sitting there feeling completely stunned," Clarke said. "It had never occurred to me in my entire life that anything like this would ever happen."
The University of California, Berkeley professor said his phone kept ringing, emails began pouring in, and people started "banging on my door" seeking interviews at 3:00 am (1000 GMT).
"I said no thank you, not at this time of night," the British 83-year-old said with a chuckle.
Clarke shared the coveted prize with two fellow physicists who worked in his Berkeley lab at the time of the trio's research, Frenchman Michel Devoret and American John Martinis. All three scientists are researchers at American universities.
The physicist noted the significant resources he was afforded at the time of their work some four decades ago, including lab space, graduate assistants and equipment.
And he called US President Donald Trump's efforts to reshape American science and health policy -- including mass firings to government scientists and steep slashes to research budgets -- an "immensely serious problem."
"This will cripple much of United States science research," he told AFP, adding that he knew people who have taken enormous funding hits.
"It is going to be disastrous if this continues," Clarke said. "Assuming that the present administration finally comes to an end, it may take a decade to get back to where we were, say, half a year ago."
"It's a huge problem" that's "entirely beyond any understanding of anyone who is a scientist," he said.
- 'Basic science' -
Nobel laureate Mary Brunkow, among Monday's winners for medicine, had similarly emphasized to journalists the importance of US public financing to scientific research.
This year's physics laureates carried out their experiments in the 1980s, research that enabled real-world applications of the quantum realm.
Quantum mechanics takes over when things get tiny -- think subatomic -- and the rules of traditional physics no longer apply.
For example, when a normal ball hits a wall, it bounces back. But on the quantum scale, a particle will actually pass straight through a comparable wall -- a phenomenon called "tunneling."
Clarke and his fellow winners demonstrated tunneling on a scale the public can grasp.
As the Nobel committee put it, their work showed "the bizarre properties of the quantum world can be made concrete in a system big enough to be held in the hand."
That research made possible technologies like the cell phone, and also proved foundational in the race to develop powerful quantum computers.
Clarke noted Tuesday that it is "vital" to keep conducting -- and funding -- work that might seem like "basic science" but results in "crucial applications" down the line.
"Michel and John and I had no way of understanding the importance" their work would have, he said.
"If you'd asked us 40 years ago, we would have said, 'Well yeah, it's an interesting thing.'"
He emphasized that researchers who lay the groundwork "are not that people who actually use that effect to do something that is vitally important."
"It's so important to do this basic science, because you don't know what the outcome is going to be."
C.Peyronnet--CPN