-
Kenya's economy faces climate change risks: World Bank
-
Italian bank UniCredit makes bid for Germany's Commerzbank
-
AI to drive growth despite geopolitics, Taiwan's Foxconn says
-
Filipinas seek abortions online in largely Catholic nation
-
'One Battle After Another' wins best picture Oscar
-
South Koreans bask in Oscars triumph for 'KPop Demon Hunters'
-
'One Battle After Another' dominates Oscars
-
Norway's Oscar winner 'Sentimental Value': a failing father seeks redemption
-
Indonesia firms in palm oil fraud probe supplied fuel majors
-
Milan-Cortina Paralympics end as a 'beacon of unity'
-
It's 'Sinners' vs 'One Battle' as Oscars day arrives
-
Oscars night: latest developments
-
US Fed expected to hold rates steady as Iran war roils outlook
-
It's 'Sinners' v 'One Battle' as Oscars day arrives
-
US mayors push back against data center boom as AI backlash grows
-
Who covers AI business blunders? Some insurers cautiously step up
-
Election campaign deepens Congo's generational divide
-
Courchevel super-G cancelled due to snow and fog
-
Middle East turmoil revives Norway push for Arctic drilling
-
Iran, US threaten attacks on oil facilities
-
Oscars: the 10 nominees for best picture
-
Spielberg defends ballet, opera after Chalamet snub
-
Kharg Island bombed, Trump says US to escort ships through Hormuz soon
-
Jurors mull evidence in social media addiction trial
-
UK govt warns petrol retailers against 'unfair practices' during Iran war
-
Mideast war cuts Hormuz strait transit to 77 ships: maritime data firm
-
How will US oil sanctions waiver help Russia?
-
Oil stays above $100, stocks slide tracking Mideast war
-
How Iranians are communicating through internet blackout
-
Global shipping industry caught in storm of war
-
Why is the dollar profiting from Middle East war?
-
Oil dips under $100, stocks back in green tracking Mideast war
-
US Fed's preferred inflation gauge edges down
-
Deadly blast rocks Iran as leaders attend rally in show of defiance
-
Moscow pushes US to ease more oil sanctions
-
AI agent 'lobster fever' grips China despite risks
-
Thousands of Chinese boats mass at sea, raising questions
-
Casting directors finally get their due at Oscars
-
Fantastic Mr Stowaway: fox sails from Britain to New York port
-
US jury to begin deliberations in social media addiction trial
-
NASA says 'on track' for Artemis 2 launch as soon as April 1
-
Valentino mixes 80s and Baroque splendour on Rome return
-
Dating app Tinder dabbles with AI matchmaking
-
Scavenging ravens memorize vast tracts of wolf hunting grounds: study
-
Top US, China economy officials to meet for talks in Paris
-
Chile's Smiljan Radic Clarke wins Pritzker architecture prize
-
Lufthansa flights axed as pilots walk out
-
Oil tops $100 as fresh Iran attacks offset stockpiles release
-
US military 'not ready' to escort tankers through Hormuz Strait: energy secretary
-
WWII leader Churchill to be removed from UK banknotes
Activists take German government to court over biodiversity
A German environmental activist group said Wednesday it was taking the government to the country's highest court to force it to take more action to protect biodiversity at home and globally.
The German Federation for the Environment and Nature Conservation (BUND) charged that "the government is not doing enough to protect biodiversity", a day after submitting its complaint at the constitutional court.
"We are losing 150 species every day" while a third of species worldwide are at risk, said Myriam Rapior, the vice president of BUND, the German arm of the group Friends of the Earth.
The group said the rate at which fauna and flora species disappear today is "a hundred to a thousand times higher than the normal biological extinction rate", labelling it a problem that rivals the climate crisis.
It argued that the German government is obliged and treaty-bound to draw up a legally effective biodiversity protection policy that "secures our livelihoods for the future".
The biodiversity case is the latest in a series of lawsuits worldwide in recent years targeting governments and businesses with the aim of making them step up their efforts to protect the environment.
Several individuals have joined the lawsuit to demand that the government impose "measurable restrictions" on the cultivation of livestock and the use of pesticides, said Felix Ekardt, BUND's regional director in the state of Saxony.
- 'Full of exceptions' -
According to BUND and its supporters, an EU regulation on biodiversity adopted in June is "too vague in its demands", "full of exceptions" and gives politicians "far too long" to act.
Lawyer and BUND board member Franziska Hess said that the outcome of the lawsuit could be expected "in one or two years".
In 2021, Germany's constitutional court delivered a historic ruling that found that then chancellor Angela Merkel's flagship climate protection plan was "insufficient" and would "violate the freedoms" of future generations.
That prompted the government to approve a new law setting more ambitious targets to reduce carbon emissions.
The Climate Action Programme adopted in October 2023 under Merkel's successor Olaf Scholz was also judged insufficient in a court ruling last year.
Speaking at a regular government press conference on Wednesday, environment ministry spokesman Andreas Kuebler said the government was following the latest case "with calm and interest".
He said it expected the court to confirm that the government "is doing a lot to protect biodiversity".
Kuebler pointed to the government's "unprecedented" nature and climate protection plan for 2024-28 to which it has committed 3.5 billion euros ($3.8 billion).
Y.Ibrahim--CPN