-
Kenya's economy faces climate change risks: World Bank
-
US Fed expected to hold rates steady as Iran war roils outlook
-
It's 'Sinners' v 'One Battle' as Oscars day arrives
-
US mayors push back against data center boom as AI backlash grows
-
Who covers AI business blunders? Some insurers cautiously step up
-
Election campaign deepens Congo's generational divide
-
Courchevel super-G cancelled due to snow and fog
-
Middle East turmoil revives Norway push for Arctic drilling
-
Iran, US threaten attacks on oil facilities
-
Oscars: the 10 nominees for best picture
-
Spielberg defends ballet, opera after Chalamet snub
-
Kharg Island bombed, Trump says US to escort ships through Hormuz soon
-
Jurors mull evidence in social media addiction trial
-
UK govt warns petrol retailers against 'unfair practices' during Iran war
-
Mideast war cuts Hormuz strait transit to 77 ships: maritime data firm
-
How will US oil sanctions waiver help Russia?
-
Oil stays above $100, stocks slide tracking Mideast war
-
How Iranians are communicating through internet blackout
-
Global shipping industry caught in storm of war
-
Why is the dollar profiting from Middle East war?
-
Oil dips under $100, stocks back in green tracking Mideast war
-
US Fed's preferred inflation gauge edges down
-
Deadly blast rocks Iran as leaders attend rally in show of defiance
-
Moscow pushes US to ease more oil sanctions
-
AI agent 'lobster fever' grips China despite risks
-
Thousands of Chinese boats mass at sea, raising questions
-
Casting directors finally get their due at Oscars
-
Fantastic Mr Stowaway: fox sails from Britain to New York port
-
US jury to begin deliberations in social media addiction trial
-
NASA says 'on track' for Artemis 2 launch as soon as April 1
-
Valentino mixes 80s and Baroque splendour on Rome return
-
Dating app Tinder dabbles with AI matchmaking
-
Scavenging ravens memorize vast tracts of wolf hunting grounds: study
-
Top US, China economy officials to meet for talks in Paris
-
Chile's Smiljan Radic Clarke wins Pritzker architecture prize
-
Lufthansa flights axed as pilots walk out
-
Oil tops $100 as fresh Iran attacks offset stockpiles release
-
US military 'not ready' to escort tankers through Hormuz Strait: energy secretary
-
WWII leader Churchill to be removed from UK banknotes
-
EU vows to 'respond firmly' to any trade pact breach by US
-
'Punished' for university: debt-laden UK graduates urge reform
-
Mideast war to brake German recovery: institute
-
China-North Korea train arrives in Pyongyang after 6-year halt
-
Businessman or politician? Billionaire Czech PM under fire again
-
Lost page of legendary Archimedes palimpsest found in France
-
Cathay Pacific roughly doubles fuel surcharge on most routes
-
BMW profit holds up despite Trump tariffs, China woes
-
Electric vehicle rethink to cost Honda almost $16 billion
-
From Kyiv to UK, Ukrainian drone production spans Europe
-
Australia to change fuel quality standards to boost supply
Australia ban offers test on social media harm
Australia's under-16 social media ban will make the nation a real-life laboratory on how best to tackle the technology's impact on young people, experts say.
Those in favour of the world-first December 10 ban point to a growing mass of studies that suggest too much time online takes a toll on teen wellbeing.
But opponents argue there is not enough hard proof to warrant the new legislation, which could do more harm than good.
Adolescent brains are still developing into the early 20s, said psychologist Amy Orben, who leads a digital mental health programme at the University of Cambridge.
A "huge amount" of observational research, often based on surveys, has tracked a correlation between teen tech use and worse mental health, she told AFP.
But it is hard to draw firm conclusions, because phones are so ingrained into daily life, and young people may turn to social media because they are already suffering.
"With technology, because it's changing so fast, the evidence base will always be uncertain," Orben said.
"What could change the dial are experimental studies or evaluations of natural experiments. So evaluating the Australia ban is hugely important because it actually gives us a window on what might be happening."
- No 'smoking gun' -
To try and shed light on the cause-and-effect relationship, Australian researchers are recruiting 13- to 16-year-olds for a "Connected Minds Study" to assess how the ban affects their wellbeing.
A World Health Organization survey last year found that 11 percent of adolescents struggled to control their use of social media.
Other research has shown a link between excessive social media use and poor sleep, body image, school performance and emotional distress, such as a 2019 study of US schoolchildren in JAMA Psychiatry that found those who spent over three hours a day on social media could be at heightened risk for mental health problems.
So some experts argue the right time to act is now.
"I actually don't think this is a science issue. This is a values issue," said Christian Heim, an Australian psychiatrist and clinical director of mental health.
"We're talking about things like cyberbullying, the risk of suicide, accessing sites on anorexia nervosa and self-harm," he told AFP.
Evidence of a risk is growing, Heim said -- pointing to a 2018 study by neuroscientist Christian Montag that linked addiction to the Chinese messaging app WeChat to shrinking grey matter volume in part of the brain.
"We can't wait for stronger evidence," Heim said.
Scott Griffiths of the Melbourne School of Psychological Sciences said a "smoking gun research study" was unlikely to emerge soon to prove the harms of social media.
But the ban was worth trying, he said.
"I'm hopeful that the major social media companies seeing this full-throated legislative action come into play will finally be motivated to more meaningfully protect the health and wellbeing of young people."
- 'Too blunt' -
More than three-quarters of Australian adults agreed with the new legislation before it passed, a poll indicated.
However, an open letter signed by more than 140 academics, campaigners and other experts cautioned that a ban would be "too blunt an instrument".
"People were saying: 'Well, kids are getting more anxious. There must be a reason -- let's ban social media'," argued one signatory, Axel Bruns, a digital media professor at Queensland University of Technology.
Children may simply have more reasons to be anxious, under pressure from pandemic-interrupted schooling and troubled by wars in Gaza and Ukraine, he told AFP.
And a ban might push some teens to more extreme, fringe sites, while preventing other marginalised young people from finding community.
Noelle Martin, an activist focused on image-based online abuse and deepfakes, feared the Australian ban would do little to help, given the country's history on enforcement of existing laws.
"I don't believe it will stop, prevent or do much to meaningfully combat this issue," Martin said.
In any case, the political decision has been taken in Australia.
"Social media is doing social harm to our children," Prime Minister Anthony Albanese said this year.
"There is no doubt that Australian kids are being negatively impacted by online platforms, so I'm calling time on it."
M.Davis--CPN