-
Kenya's economy faces climate change risks: World Bank
-
US Fed expected to hold rates steady as Iran war roils outlook
-
It's 'Sinners' v 'One Battle' as Oscars day arrives
-
US mayors push back against data center boom as AI backlash grows
-
Who covers AI business blunders? Some insurers cautiously step up
-
Election campaign deepens Congo's generational divide
-
Courchevel super-G cancelled due to snow and fog
-
Middle East turmoil revives Norway push for Arctic drilling
-
Iran, US threaten attacks on oil facilities
-
Oscars: the 10 nominees for best picture
-
Spielberg defends ballet, opera after Chalamet snub
-
Kharg Island bombed, Trump says US to escort ships through Hormuz soon
-
Jurors mull evidence in social media addiction trial
-
UK govt warns petrol retailers against 'unfair practices' during Iran war
-
Mideast war cuts Hormuz strait transit to 77 ships: maritime data firm
-
How will US oil sanctions waiver help Russia?
-
Oil stays above $100, stocks slide tracking Mideast war
-
How Iranians are communicating through internet blackout
-
Global shipping industry caught in storm of war
-
Why is the dollar profiting from Middle East war?
-
Oil dips under $100, stocks back in green tracking Mideast war
-
US Fed's preferred inflation gauge edges down
-
Deadly blast rocks Iran as leaders attend rally in show of defiance
-
Moscow pushes US to ease more oil sanctions
-
AI agent 'lobster fever' grips China despite risks
-
Thousands of Chinese boats mass at sea, raising questions
-
Casting directors finally get their due at Oscars
-
Fantastic Mr Stowaway: fox sails from Britain to New York port
-
US jury to begin deliberations in social media addiction trial
-
NASA says 'on track' for Artemis 2 launch as soon as April 1
-
Valentino mixes 80s and Baroque splendour on Rome return
-
Dating app Tinder dabbles with AI matchmaking
-
Scavenging ravens memorize vast tracts of wolf hunting grounds: study
-
Top US, China economy officials to meet for talks in Paris
-
Chile's Smiljan Radic Clarke wins Pritzker architecture prize
-
Lufthansa flights axed as pilots walk out
-
Oil tops $100 as fresh Iran attacks offset stockpiles release
-
US military 'not ready' to escort tankers through Hormuz Strait: energy secretary
-
WWII leader Churchill to be removed from UK banknotes
-
EU vows to 'respond firmly' to any trade pact breach by US
-
'Punished' for university: debt-laden UK graduates urge reform
-
Mideast war to brake German recovery: institute
-
China-North Korea train arrives in Pyongyang after 6-year halt
-
Businessman or politician? Billionaire Czech PM under fire again
-
Lost page of legendary Archimedes palimpsest found in France
-
Cathay Pacific roughly doubles fuel surcharge on most routes
-
BMW profit holds up despite Trump tariffs, China woes
-
Electric vehicle rethink to cost Honda almost $16 billion
-
From Kyiv to UK, Ukrainian drone production spans Europe
-
Australia to change fuel quality standards to boost supply
Trump jeopardising US role as scientific leader: Nobel officials
Donald Trump's assault on science could threaten the United States' position as the world's leading research nation and have knock-on effects worldwide, Nobel Prize officials in Sweden told AFP.
Since taking office in January, the US president has cut billions of dollars in funding, attacked universities' academic freedoms and overseen mass layoffs of scientists across federal agencies.
Next week, the Nobel Prizes will be announced in Stockholm and Oslo, and chances are high that researchers working in the United States will take home some of the prestigious awards.
The United States is home to more Nobel science laureates than any other country, due largely to its longstanding investment in basic science and academic freedoms.
But that could change, said Hans Ellegren, secretary general of the Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences, which awards the Nobel prizes in physics, chemistry, and economics.
"In the post-war period, the US has taken over Germany's role as the world's leading scientific nation. When they now start cutting research funding, it threatens the country's position," he told AFP.
Since January, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) have terminated 2,100 research grants totalling around $9.5 billion and $2.6 billion in contracts, according to an independent database called Grant Watch.
Affected projects include studies on gender, the health effects of global warming, Alzheimer's disease and cancer.
Efforts are under way to restore some of the funding but uncertainty looms.
Other fields in Trump's line of fire include vaccines, climate change and diversity, equity and inclusion.
Thomas Perlmann, secretary general of the committee that awards the Nobel Prize for Medicine, said it was "no coincidence that the US has by far the most Nobel laureates".
"But there is now a creeping sense of uncertainty about the US' willingness to maintain their leading position in research," he said.
Perlmann called the United States "the very engine" of scientific research worldwide.
"There would be very serious consequences for research globally if it starts to falter," he added.
"It doesn't take very many years of large cutbacks to cause irreversible harm."
- 'China on the rise' -
Trump's cuts could lead to a brain drain and ripple effects on research in other countries, Ellegren and Perlmann said.
Scientists and researchers who have already lost their jobs or funding may not return to their fields even if budgets are restored, and younger would-be scientists may decide not to pursue a career in research, they said.
"There is a risk that a whole generation of young researchers will be lost," Ellegren warned.
While Trump's policies primarily affect US research, international cooperation is already suffering as a result, he said.
The NIH finance collaborations in other countries, "and that has become more difficult under the new administration".
"Any nationalist or chauvinistically inclined regulation of academic activity hampers the global exchange of ideas and data," Ellegren stressed.
"Research is by nature global. Researchers have always exchanged knowledge and experiences."
Some countries have tried to attract US scientists, while non-American researchers may be tempted to leave the United States to pursue their work elsewhere.
A US retreat could therefore open the door for other nations to take big strides.
"Research is an important basis for innovation and entrepreneurship. That means it could become easier for other countries to compete with the US," Ellegren suggested.
"The big global trend right now is that research in China is on the rise," he said, adding: "They are investing unbelievable resources."
Perlmann said Trump ought to protect the US legacy.
"You would hope that Trump doesn't want to give a walkover to China and other countries keen to take over the leader's jersey."
If given a chance to talk directly to Trump, Ellegren said he would impress upon him that it was in America's own interest to maintain academic freedoms and scientific funding.
"I would say that... one of the reasons your country has been so successful is that researchers have been able to seek new knowledge and have good resources."
"The United States has invested a lot in research in the post-war period, both privately and federally. And that is what has helped your country build its prosperity," he said.
L.Peeters--CPN