-
Kenya's economy faces climate change risks: World Bank
-
Nvidia rides 'claw' craze with AI agent platform
-
Damaged Russian tanker has 700 tonnes of fuel on board: Moscow
-
Talks towards international panel to tackle 'inequality emergency' begin at UN
-
EU talks energy as oil price soars
-
Swiss government rejects proposal to limit immigration
-
Ingredients of life discovered in Ryugu asteroid samples
-
Why Iranian drones are hard to stop
-
France threatens to block funds for India over climate inaction
-
"So proud": Irish hometown hails Oscar winner Jessie Buckley
-
European bank battle heats up as UniCredit swoops for Commerzbank
-
Italian bank UniCredit makes bid for Germany's Commerzbank
-
AI to drive growth despite geopolitics, Taiwan's Foxconn says
-
Filipinas seek abortions online in largely Catholic nation
-
'One Battle After Another' wins best picture Oscar
-
South Koreans bask in Oscars triumph for 'KPop Demon Hunters'
-
'One Battle After Another' dominates Oscars
-
Norway's Oscar winner 'Sentimental Value': a failing father seeks redemption
-
Indonesia firms in palm oil fraud probe supplied fuel majors
-
Milan-Cortina Paralympics end as a 'beacon of unity'
-
It's 'Sinners' vs 'One Battle' as Oscars day arrives
-
Oscars night: latest developments
-
US Fed expected to hold rates steady as Iran war roils outlook
-
It's 'Sinners' v 'One Battle' as Oscars day arrives
-
US mayors push back against data center boom as AI backlash grows
-
Who covers AI business blunders? Some insurers cautiously step up
-
Election campaign deepens Congo's generational divide
-
Courchevel super-G cancelled due to snow and fog
-
Middle East turmoil revives Norway push for Arctic drilling
-
Iran, US threaten attacks on oil facilities
-
Oscars: the 10 nominees for best picture
-
Spielberg defends ballet, opera after Chalamet snub
-
Kharg Island bombed, Trump says US to escort ships through Hormuz soon
-
Jurors mull evidence in social media addiction trial
-
UK govt warns petrol retailers against 'unfair practices' during Iran war
-
Mideast war cuts Hormuz strait transit to 77 ships: maritime data firm
-
How will US oil sanctions waiver help Russia?
-
Oil stays above $100, stocks slide tracking Mideast war
-
How Iranians are communicating through internet blackout
-
Global shipping industry caught in storm of war
-
Why is the dollar profiting from Middle East war?
-
Oil dips under $100, stocks back in green tracking Mideast war
-
US Fed's preferred inflation gauge edges down
-
Deadly blast rocks Iran as leaders attend rally in show of defiance
-
Moscow pushes US to ease more oil sanctions
-
AI agent 'lobster fever' grips China despite risks
-
Thousands of Chinese boats mass at sea, raising questions
-
Casting directors finally get their due at Oscars
-
Fantastic Mr Stowaway: fox sails from Britain to New York port
-
US jury to begin deliberations in social media addiction trial
Judge tosses California children's pollution suit against US govt
A federal lawsuit brought by a group of California children who claimed the US government was harming them by failing to clamp down on pollution has been tossed out by a judge.
The case was one of a series of legal actions taken around the world by young people worried about the effects of climate change.
The youths, aged between eight and 17, had claimed the US Environmental Protection Agency "intentionally allows life-threatening climate pollution to be emitted by the fossil fuel sources of greenhouse gases it regulates, harming children's health and welfare."
The suit, filed on December 10, asked the federal court to declare the EPA had violated the plaintiffs' constitutional rights to equal protection under the law and their fundamental right to life.
But a federal judge on Wednesday dismissed the lawsuit, saying the children could not make their case.
"Here, plaintiffs' claimed injuries include 'a lifetime of harms and hardship,'" said US District Judge Michael Fitzgerald in his ruling in Los Angeles.
But they "have failed to demonstrate how a declaration regarding plaintiffs' rights under the Constitution and the legality of defendants' conduct, on its own, is likely to remedy these alleged injuries."
Our Children's Trust, a non-profit that helped bring the case, slammed the judge's decision as "unjust and dangerous."
"When presented with a constitutional violation, there is no reason for a federal judge to throw up his hands and say nothing can be done," said the organization's co-executive director Mat dos Santos.
"In doing just that, this order tells children that judges have no power to hear their complaints.
"Courts do, in fact, have that power. Courts have a responsibility to hear constitutional violations, as they've done in many important cases in our nation's history."
Dos Santos said Our Children's Trust would file an amended complaint.
The case in California comes after the European Court of Human Rights in September began hearing a complaint brought by six Portuguese youths against 32 nations they accused of not doing enough to stop global warming.
In August, a court in the US state of Montana ruled in favor of a group of youths who accused the state of violating their rights to a clean environment.
That case, which also involved Our Children's Trust, is being appealed by Montana's attorney general.
Our Children's Trust has previously also launched cases in Hawaii, Utah, Virginia and Oregon.
St.Ch.Baker--CPN