-
Kenya's economy faces climate change risks: World Bank
-
France, Spain assess scorched terrain as new wildfires threaten other regions
-
British oil giant BP aims to sell North Sea business
-
Chipmaker Kioxia reports AI-driven 45-fold surge in quarterly net profit
-
China factory activity slides as leaders seek spending boost
-
Far right and far left battle for power in polarised Berlin
-
Tech rebound fuels record-breaking rally in South Korean stocks
-
The last trio: S.Africa's zoo elephants await their fate
-
Cables and cooling bring AI windfall to Indian suppliers
-
Oil industry sees war windfall but girds for political blowback
-
Anthropic's models gained unauthorized 'real-world' access during testing
-
Amazon beats expectations with cloud and AI growth
-
Apple tops estimates in CEO Cook's final quarter, but shares fall
-
Blowout Microsoft results lift US stocks as oil retreats
-
Milei demands expulsion of foreigners expressing 'hate' against Argentina
-
'Beginning of the end': Relief but no party as French wildfire winds down
-
Italy's Po River valley on drought alert
-
Southern Europe 'becoming more flammable' in hotter climate, experts say
-
Prada profits pinched as growth hard to chase
-
Mammoth bones found on parched bed of Danube in Bulgaria
-
Stocks climb on earnings and rates, oil retreats
-
MEXC Lists Grvt (GRVT) with $60,000 Worth of GRVT and 10,000 USDT in Airdrop+ Rewards
-
US economic growth slows in second quarter, missing expectations
-
George and Amal Clooney flee French home due to wildfire
-
Russia adds Telegram founder Durov to 'terrorist' blacklist
-
MEXC Ventures Supports Alpha Arena's APAC Debut at Coinfest Bali
-
Stocks diverge on earnings, as oil steadies
-
AI data centre supplier Zhongji InnoLight slips on Hong Kong debut
-
Eurozone economy grows despite Middle East war
-
May, June heatwaves caused 2,877 extra deaths in England: govt
-
Singapore group will develop 'most promising' Ebola vaccine
-
BMW profit down a third as carmaker plans job cuts
-
Shell profit surges as Mideast war fuels oil prices
-
Seoul extends losses as most Asian markets drop, oil rises again
-
Car maker Stellantis says back in profit in second quarter
-
Gambling.com Group Is Now Grandstand
-
Samsung quarterly operating profit up 1,800% on AI boom
-
Meet the astronomer digging into the Milky Way's 'fossils'
-
South Korean stocks bounce after rout, oil holds gains on Mideast woes
-
AI data centre supplier Zhongji InnoLight falls on Hong Kong debut
-
South Korea's women web sleuths fight AI deepfake porn
-
Samsung operating profit up 1,800% in second quarter on AI boom
-
Anything but programmable: New cost-efficient EC-power-supply-series for the DIN rail by CAMTEC PS
-
Japanese population below 120 million for first time in decades
-
Meta misses profit expectations, sticks to massive AI spending
-
US actor Jared Leto denies latest accusations of sexual assault
-
Campari - king of the spritz - hopes to conquer American heartland
-
Danube drops to 'historic lows' as fresh heatwave hits
-
Air France-KLM and Lufthansa bid for Portugal's TAP airline
-
BTS pulls out of Grammys after Asian pop category introduction
Climate impacts set to cut 2050 global GPD by nearly a fifth
Climate change caused by CO2 emissions already in the atmosphere will shrink global GDP in 2050 by about $38 trillion, or almost a fifth, no matter how aggressively humanity cuts carbon pollution, researchers said Wednesday.
But slashing greenhouse gas emissions as quickly as possible remains crucial to avoid even more devastating economic impacts after mid-century, they reported in the journal Nature.
Economic fallout from climate change, the study shows, could increase tens of trillions of dollars per year by 2100 if the planet were to warm significantly beyond two degrees Celsius above mid-19th century levels.
Earth's average surface temperature has already climbed 1.2C above that benchmark, enough to amplify heatwaves, droughts, flooding and tropical storms made more destructive by rising seas.
Annual investment needed to cap global warming below 2C -- the cornerstone goal of the 2015 Paris Agreement -- is a small fraction of the damages that would be avoided, the researchers found.
Staying under the 2C threshold "could limit average regional income loss to 20 percent compared to 60 percent" in a high-emissions scenario, lead author Max Kotz, an expert in complexity science at the Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research (PIK), told AFP.
Economists disagree on how much should be spent to avoid climate damages. Some call for massive investment now, while others argue it would be more cost-effective to wait until societies are richer and technology more advanced.
- Poor countries hit hardest -
The new research sidesteps this debate, but its eye-watering estimate of economic impacts helps make the case for ambitious near-term action, the authors and other experts said.
"Our calculations are super relevant" to such cost-benefit analyses, said co-author Leonie Wenz, also a researcher at PIK.
They could also inform government strategies for adapting to climate impacts, risk assessments for business, and UN-led negotiations over compensation for developing nations that have barely contributed to global warming, she told AFP.
Mostly tropical nations -- many with economies already shrinking due to climate damages -- will be hit hardest, the study found.
"Countries least responsible for climate change are predicted to suffer income loss that is 60 percent greater than the higher-income countries and 40 percent greater than higher-emission countries," said senior PIK scientist Anders Levermann.
"They are also the ones with the least resources to adapt to its impacts."
Rich countries will not be spared either: Germany and the United States are forecast to see income shrivel by 11 percent by 2050, and France by 13 percent.
Projections are based on four decades of economic and climate data from 1,600 regions rather than country-level statistics, making it possible to include damages earlier studies ignored, such as extreme rainfall.
- A likely underestimate -
The researchers also looked at temperature fluctuations within each year rather than just averages, as well as the economic impact of extreme weather events beyond the year in which they occurred.
"By accounting for these additional climate variables, the damages are about 50 percent larger than if we were to only include changes in annual average temperatures," the basis of most prior estimates, said Wenz.
Wenz and her colleagues found that unavoidable damage would slash the global economy's GPD by 17 percent in 2050, compared to a scenario with no additional climate impacts after 2020.
Even so, the new calculations may be conservative.
"They are likely to be an underestimate of the costs of climate change impacts," Bob Ward, policy director of the Grantham Research Institute on Climate Change and the Environment in London, commented to AFP ahead of the study's publication.
Damages linked to sea-level rise, stronger tropical cyclones, the destabilisation of ice sheets and the decline of major tropical forests are all excluded, he noted.
Climate economist Gernot Wagner, a professor at Columbia Business School in New York who was also not involved in the study, said the conclusion that "trillions in damages are all locked in doesn't mean that cutting carbon pollution doesn't pay."
In fact, he said, it shows that "the costs of acting are a fraction of the costs of unmitigated climate change".
Global GDP in 2022 was just over $100 trillion, according to the World Bank. The study projects that -- absent climate impacts after 2020 -- it would be double that in 2050.
A.Samuel--CPN