-
Kenya's economy faces climate change risks: World Bank
-
Iran activates air defences as Trump faces congressional deadline
-
India's cows offer biogas alternative to Mideast energy crunch
-
Crude edges up after wild swing, stocks track Wall St rally
-
New Princess Diana documentary promises her own words
-
Oil slumps after hitting peak, US indices reach new records
-
Venezuela leader hikes minimum wage package by 26%
-
Apple earnings beat forecasts on iPhone 17 demand
-
Bangladesh signs biggest-ever plane deal for 14 Boeings
-
Musk grilled on AI profits at OpenAI trial
-
Venezuela opens arms to world with Miami-Caracas flight
-
US Congress votes to end record government shutdown
-
First direct US-Venezuela flight in years arrives in Caracas
-
Just telling nations to quit fossil fuels 'not realistic': COP31 chief
-
Trump hails 'greatest king' Charles as state visit wraps up
-
Drivers help study road-trip mystery: what became of bug splats?
-
Oil strikes 4-year peak, stocks rise
-
Iran's supreme leader defies US blockade as oil prices soar
-
White House against Anthropic expanding Mythos model access: report
-
Oil crisis fuels calls to speed up clean energy transition
-
European rocket blasts off with Amazon internet satellites
-
Nigerian airlines avert shutdown as Mideast war hikes fuel prices
-
ArcelorMittal boosts sales but profits squeezed
-
German growth beats forecast but energy shock looms
-
Air France-KLM trims 2026 outlook over Middle East war impact
-
Oil surges 7% to top $126 on Trump blockade warning
-
Volkswagen warns of more cost cuts as profits plunge
-
Rolls-Royce confident on profits despite Mideast war disruption
-
French economy records zero growth in first quarter
-
Carmaker Stellantis swings back into profit as sales climb
-
Trump warns Iran blockade could last months, sending oil prices soaring
-
Denmark's Soren Torpegaard Lund to 'stay true' at Eurovision
-
Mamdani calls on King Charles to return Koh-i-Noor diamond
-
Key points from the first global talks on phasing out fossil fuels
-
Cuban boy's sporting dreams on hold as surgery backlog grows
-
Bali drowning in trash after landfill closed
-
ECB set to hold rates despite Iran war energy shock
-
Samsung Electronics posts record quarterly profit on AI boom
-
OMP Ranked in Highest Two Across All Four Use Cases in the 2026 Gartner(R) Critical Capabilities for Supply Chain Planning Solutions: Process Industries
-
Meta chief Zuckerberg doubles down on AI spending
-
Google-parent Alphabet soars as Meta stumbles over AI costs
-
Brazil lowers benchmark rate to 14.5% in second consecutive cut
-
Google-parent Alphabet soars as rivals stumble over AI costs
-
Anti-Bezos campaign urges Met Gala boycott in New York
-
African oil producers defend need to drill at fossil fuel exit talks
-
'Gritty' Philadelphia pitches itself as low-cost US World Cup choice
-
'I literally was a fool': Musk grilled in OpenAI trial
-
OpenAI facing 'waves' of US lawsuits over Canada mass shooting
-
Ticket price hikes not affecting summer air travel demand: IATA
-
Uber adds hotel booking in push to become 'everything app'
Climate impacts set to cut 2050 global GPD by nearly a fifth
Climate change caused by CO2 emissions already in the atmosphere will shrink global GDP in 2050 by about $38 trillion, or almost a fifth, no matter how aggressively humanity cuts carbon pollution, researchers said Wednesday.
But slashing greenhouse gas emissions as quickly as possible remains crucial to avoid even more devastating economic impacts after mid-century, they reported in the journal Nature.
Economic fallout from climate change, the study shows, could increase tens of trillions of dollars per year by 2100 if the planet were to warm significantly beyond two degrees Celsius above mid-19th century levels.
Earth's average surface temperature has already climbed 1.2C above that benchmark, enough to amplify heatwaves, droughts, flooding and tropical storms made more destructive by rising seas.
Annual investment needed to cap global warming below 2C -- the cornerstone goal of the 2015 Paris Agreement -- is a small fraction of the damages that would be avoided, the researchers found.
Staying under the 2C threshold "could limit average regional income loss to 20 percent compared to 60 percent" in a high-emissions scenario, lead author Max Kotz, an expert in complexity science at the Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research (PIK), told AFP.
Economists disagree on how much should be spent to avoid climate damages. Some call for massive investment now, while others argue it would be more cost-effective to wait until societies are richer and technology more advanced.
- Poor countries hit hardest -
The new research sidesteps this debate, but its eye-watering estimate of economic impacts helps make the case for ambitious near-term action, the authors and other experts said.
"Our calculations are super relevant" to such cost-benefit analyses, said co-author Leonie Wenz, also a researcher at PIK.
They could also inform government strategies for adapting to climate impacts, risk assessments for business, and UN-led negotiations over compensation for developing nations that have barely contributed to global warming, she told AFP.
Mostly tropical nations -- many with economies already shrinking due to climate damages -- will be hit hardest, the study found.
"Countries least responsible for climate change are predicted to suffer income loss that is 60 percent greater than the higher-income countries and 40 percent greater than higher-emission countries," said senior PIK scientist Anders Levermann.
"They are also the ones with the least resources to adapt to its impacts."
Rich countries will not be spared either: Germany and the United States are forecast to see income shrivel by 11 percent by 2050, and France by 13 percent.
Projections are based on four decades of economic and climate data from 1,600 regions rather than country-level statistics, making it possible to include damages earlier studies ignored, such as extreme rainfall.
- A likely underestimate -
The researchers also looked at temperature fluctuations within each year rather than just averages, as well as the economic impact of extreme weather events beyond the year in which they occurred.
"By accounting for these additional climate variables, the damages are about 50 percent larger than if we were to only include changes in annual average temperatures," the basis of most prior estimates, said Wenz.
Wenz and her colleagues found that unavoidable damage would slash the global economy's GPD by 17 percent in 2050, compared to a scenario with no additional climate impacts after 2020.
Even so, the new calculations may be conservative.
"They are likely to be an underestimate of the costs of climate change impacts," Bob Ward, policy director of the Grantham Research Institute on Climate Change and the Environment in London, commented to AFP ahead of the study's publication.
Damages linked to sea-level rise, stronger tropical cyclones, the destabilisation of ice sheets and the decline of major tropical forests are all excluded, he noted.
Climate economist Gernot Wagner, a professor at Columbia Business School in New York who was also not involved in the study, said the conclusion that "trillions in damages are all locked in doesn't mean that cutting carbon pollution doesn't pay."
In fact, he said, it shows that "the costs of acting are a fraction of the costs of unmitigated climate change".
Global GDP in 2022 was just over $100 trillion, according to the World Bank. The study projects that -- absent climate impacts after 2020 -- it would be double that in 2050.
A.Samuel--CPN