-
Kenya's economy faces climate change risks: World Bank
-
More Nepalis drive electric, evading global fuel shocks
-
Latecomer Japan eyes slice of rising global defence spending
-
German fertiliser makers and farmers struggle with Iran war fallout
-
OPEC+ to make first post-UAE production decision
-
Massive crowds fill Rio's Copacabana beach for Shakira concert
-
US airlines step up as Spirit winds down
-
Aviation companies step up as Spirit winds down
-
'Bookless bookstore': audio-only book shop opens in New York
-
Venezuelan protesters call government wage hike a joke
-
S&P 500, Nasdaq end at fresh records on tech earnings strength
-
Pope names former undocumented migrant as US bishop of West Virginia
-
Trump says will raise US tariffs on EU cars to 25%
-
ExxonMobil CEO sees chance of higher oil prices as earnings dip
-
After Madonna and Lady Gaga, Shakira set for Rio beach mega-gig
-
King Charles gets warm welcome in Bermuda after whirlwind US visit
-
Coe hails IOC gender testing decision
-
Baguettes take centre stage on France's Labour Day
-
Iran offers new proposal amid stalled US peace talks
-
French hub monitors Hormuz tensions from afar
-
Oil steady after wild swing, stocks diverge in thin trading
-
Chinese swimmer Sun Yang reports cyberbullying to police
-
Iran activates air defences as Trump faces congressional deadline
-
India's cows offer biogas alternative to Mideast energy crunch
-
Crude edges up after wild swing, stocks track Wall St rally
-
Formerra Appoints Matt Borowiec as Chief Commercial Officer
-
New Princess Diana documentary promises her own words
-
Oil slumps after hitting peak, US indices reach new records
-
Venezuela leader hikes minimum wage package by 26%
-
Apple earnings beat forecasts on iPhone 17 demand
-
Bangladesh signs biggest-ever plane deal for 14 Boeings
-
Musk grilled on AI profits at OpenAI trial
-
Venezuela opens arms to world with Miami-Caracas flight
-
US Congress votes to end record government shutdown
-
First direct US-Venezuela flight in years arrives in Caracas
-
Just telling nations to quit fossil fuels 'not realistic': COP31 chief
-
Trump hails 'greatest king' Charles as state visit wraps up
-
Drivers help study road-trip mystery: what became of bug splats?
-
Oil strikes 4-year peak, stocks rise
-
Iran's supreme leader defies US blockade as oil prices soar
-
White House against Anthropic expanding Mythos model access: report
-
Oil crisis fuels calls to speed up clean energy transition
-
European rocket blasts off with Amazon internet satellites
-
Nigerian airlines avert shutdown as Mideast war hikes fuel prices
-
ArcelorMittal boosts sales but profits squeezed
-
German growth beats forecast but energy shock looms
-
Air France-KLM trims 2026 outlook over Middle East war impact
-
Oil surges 7% to top $126 on Trump blockade warning
-
Volkswagen warns of more cost cuts as profits plunge
-
Rolls-Royce confident on profits despite Mideast war disruption
Jury told that Meta, Google 'engineered addiction' at landmark US trial
Meta and Google-owned YouTube were accused Monday of pushing highly addictive apps on children as a landmark social media trial began in earnest in a California court.
The blockbuster trial in front of a Los Angeles jury could establish a legal precedent on whether the social media juggernauts deliberately designed their platforms to lead to addiction in children.
The proceedings are expected to see Meta chief Mark Zuckerberg on the stand next week and Instagram boss Adam Mosseri in the courtroom as early as Wednesday. In addition to Instagram, Meta's platforms include Facebook and WhatsApp.
"This case is about two of the richest corporations in history who have engineered addiction in children's brains," plaintiffs' attorney Mark Lanier told the jury in his opening statement.
"This case is as easy as A-B-C," Lanier said as he stacked children's toy blocks bearing the letters.
He contended the A was for addicting, the B for brains and the C for children.
"They don't only build apps; they build traps," Lanier said, saying Meta and YouTube pursued "addiction by design," making his arguments using props like a toy Ferrari and a mini slot machine.
Meta attorney Paul Schmidt countered in opening remarks to the jury that evidence will show problems with the plaintiff's family and real-world bullying took a toll on her self-esteem, body image and happiness rather than Instagram.
"If you took Instagram away and everything else was the same in Kaley's life, would her life be completely different, or would she still be struggling with the same things she is today?" Schmidt asked, pointing out an Instagram addiction is never mentioned in medical records included in the evidence.
The trial before Judge Carolyn Kuhl focuses on allegations that a 20-year-old woman identified as Kaley G.M. suffered severe mental harm because she became addicted to social media as a child.
The case is being treated as a bellwether proceeding because its outcome could set the tone, and the level of payouts to successful plaintiffs, for a tidal wave of similar litigation across the United States.
Social media firms are accused in hundreds of lawsuits of leading young users to become addicted to content and suffer from depression, eating disorders, psychiatric hospitalization and even suicide.
Lawyers for the plaintiffs are borrowing strategies used in the 1990s and 2000s against the tobacco industry, which faced a similar onslaught of lawsuits arguing that companies knowingly sold a harmful product.
Lanier told the jurors that Kaley began watching YouTube at six years old because the company never told her mother "the goal was viewer addiction," or that toddlers as young as two were being targeted despite "critical" risk of addiction.
"This is the first time that a social media company has ever had to face a jury for harming kids," Social Media Victims Law Center founder Matthew Bergman, whose team is involved in more than 1,000 such cases, told AFP.
- 'Strongly disagree' -
Internet titans have argued that they are shielded by Section 230 of the US Communications Decency Act, which frees them from responsibility for what social media users post.
However, this case argues that those firms are culpable for business models designed to hold people's attention and to promote content that can harm their mental health.
The plaintiffs said they would call expert witnesses that will argue that young people's brains are not yet developed to withstand the powers of the algorithms being flung at them on Instagram and YouTube.
The company pointed to recent efforts to provide more safeguards for young people, adding that "we're always working to do better."
Jose Castaneda, a YouTube spokesperson, said "the allegations in these complaints are simply not true."
Lawyers for YouTube are to present opening remarks to the jury on Tuesday.
Snapchat and TikTok were named as defendants in the suit, but struck settlement deals before the start of the trial. The terms were not disclosed.
Lawsuits, including some brought by school districts, accusing social media platforms of practices endangering young users are making their way through federal court in northern California and state courts across the country.
A separate lawsuit accusing Meta of putting profit over the wellbeing of young users was also getting under way in New Mexico on Monday.
M.P.Jacobs--CPN