Coin Press - Argentina reshapes oil


Argentina reshapes oil




For decades Venezuela was synonymous with oil wealth. With more than 300 billion barrels of crude in the ground, the country was once among the top global producers, pumping more than 3 million barrels per day in the late 1990s. Today that legacy has been squandered. A combination of nationalization, decades of under‑investment, corruption and increasingly severe sanctions left the once‑mighty industry in disrepair. Production fell to roughly half a million barrels a day during the pandemic and only recovered to about one million barrels per day by the end of 2025. Analysts warn that reviving output to historic levels would require annual investments of around US$10 billion for at least a decade.

The heavy, extra‑viscous crude that constitutes most of Venezuela’s reserves requires diluents such as condensate to flow through pipelines and be exported. With domestic production of light hydrocarbons down to a few tens of thousands of barrels per day, the industry depends on imports to make its oil marketable. Infrastructure has also deteriorated: many refineries operate at a fraction of their capacity, pipelines leak into Lake Maracaibo and other waterways, and some equipment has been cannibalized for spare parts. Even modest increases in exports in early 2026 were achieved under tight supervision from the United States and did little to change the structural problems afflicting the sector. In short, the country with the world’s largest crude reserves is unlikely to flood the market any time soon.

Argentina’s shale revolution
While Venezuela languishes, Argentina has emerged as a bright spot in Latin American energy. At the heart of this renaissance is Vaca Muerta, an 8.6‑million‑acre shale formation in the Neuquén Basin. Energy officials estimate it contains roughly 16 billion barrels of technically recoverable shale oil and more than 300 trillion cubic feet of natural gas resources. Until recently these riches were largely untapped, but a combination of technological advances in horizontal drilling and hydraulic fracturing, favourable global oil prices, and improved infrastructure have unleashed a wave of production. Argentina’s oil output surged 50 % from early 2021 to September 2024, with unconventional wells providing the lion’s share of growth. By September 2025, total crude oil production averaged 833,874 barrels per day, a record for the country, and unconventional output alone hit 550,881 barrels per day — a 30 % increase year on year. Oil from Vaca Muerta now accounts for roughly two‑thirds of national output, while the same formation provides almost three‑quarters of Argentina’s natural gas.

Vaca Muerta’s geology makes it a highly attractive asset. Its shale layers are thicker than those of the Eagle Ford and Bakken plays in the United States and comparable in quality to the Permian Basin. Wells drilled there boast high productivity and low breakeven costs; estimates suggest producers can make money at US$36 to US$45 per barrel. The crude is light and low in sulfur, making it easier to refine and resulting in a smaller carbon footprint than many other petroleum grades. Yet only about a tenth of the formation is currently under development, hinting at decades of growth potential.

Infrastructure and policy – turning resources into exports
Rapid growth in shale output has forced Argentina to rethink its infrastructure. A wave of new pipelines and policy reforms is turning the country from a net importer of hydrocarbons into a potential exporter. On the oil side, the Vaca Muerta Norte pipeline to Chile came into service in 2023, and the massive Vaca Muerta Oil Sur (VMOS) project — now under construction — will connect the shale patch to the Atlantic coast with an eventual capacity of 180,000 barrels per day by late 2026. Five huge storage tanks, each more than 30 metres tall and 87 metres across, are being built to handle the flow. Crude oil exports rose by about one‑third per year between 2017 and 2023 as pipeline bottlenecks were eased, and new capacity is expected to unlock even more shipments.

On the gas side, the Perito Francisco Pascasio Moreno pipeline began operations in 2023, transporting up to 0.7 billion cubic feet per day northwards. A second phase will increase capacity to 1.2 billion cubic feet per day by 2028. Work is also underway to reverse the flow of the Gasoducto Norte pipeline so that Vaca Muerta gas can be exported to Brazil. These projects have already reduced Argentina’s dependence on imported natural gas; liquefied natural gas imports were down 43 % in the first nine months of 2024, and pipeline imports from Bolivia ended entirely in September 2024. Talks are underway to send Argentine gas through Bolivia to Brazil, underscoring the region’s shifting energy flows.

Policy has been just as important as bricks and mortar. In mid‑2024 the Argentine Congress approved the so‑called “Ley Bases,” sweeping economic reforms that limit government intervention in energy markets, allow permit holders to transport and export hydrocarbons freely, and authorize long‑term liquefied natural gas export licences. A complementary large‑investment regime offers 30 years of tax stability, duty‑free import of capital goods and free mobility of capital to investors in energy, mining and infrastructure projects. Together with the Plan Gas programs, which guarantee prices and long‑term contracts for producers, these measures have catalyzed investment from both domestic and foreign companies. The energy ministry envisions US$30 billion in annual energy exports by 2030. A consortium led by Argentina’s state‑controlled YPF, along with Pan American Energy, Pampa Energía and Harbour Energy, is fast‑tracking a floating LNG project expected to start shipping liquefied natural gas in 2027. The first phase has secured approval to export 11.5 million cubic metres of natural gas per day under a 30‑year licence, potentially generating about US$1 billion a year in revenue.

Economic impact and regional dynamics
This shale boom is reshaping Argentina’s economy. In 2025 the energy trade balance recorded a surplus of about US$7.8 billion — the largest in more than three decades. Energy exports reached record levels, providing much‑needed foreign currency to a country long plagued by chronic shortages. President Javier Milei’s administration sees the sector as a pillar of his broader strategy to stabilize public finances and attract private investment. Investors have responded: new drilling has propelled Argentina into the top tier of Latin American producers. By late 2025 the country ranked fourth in the region behind Brazil, Venezuela and Guyana, having briefly overtaken Colombia before Guyana’s offshore megaprojects came online. With projections for shale output to exceed one million barrels per day by the end of the decade, Argentina could soon challenge Venezuela’s fading dominance in regional oil markets.

The shift also has geopolitical implications. Argentina’s gas will soon flow north to Chile, Uruguay and potentially Brazil, reducing those countries’ reliance on Bolivian and LNG supplies. Meanwhile, Venezuela’s stagnation and the uncertainty surrounding sanctions have created openings for other producers. Even with some restrictions eased in early 2026 to allow U.S. companies to trade Venezuelan oil, production constraints remain and exports are effectively supervised by Washington. Export volumes around 800,000 barrels per day in early 2026 were still below what the country shipped a decade ago. As a result, Latin American refiners and importers are increasingly looking to Argentina’s light sweet crude and Brazil’s offshore barrels, rather than Venezuela’s heavy grades.

Challenges and prospects
Despite the upbeat trajectory, Argentina faces challenges. Rapid production growth has outpaced pipeline and storage capacity, leading to occasional flaring or forced well shut‑ins. Unconventional gas output dipped in late 2025 due to maintenance and infrastructure bottlenecks. The success of the energy export strategy hinges on finishing major pipelines on time, maintaining policy consistency across changes of government, and managing environmental impacts. Shale development requires large volumes of water and can provoke local opposition if not handled responsibly. Additionally, although the Ley Bases and investment regime are promising, Argentina’s history of policy reversals makes long‑term investors cautious.

Still, the contrast with Venezuela could not be starker. While one country struggles to maintain basic production amid sanctions, corruption and crumbling equipment, the other is building pipelines, signing long‑term LNG contracts, and capturing the attention of global energy investors. For those watching Latin America’s oil map, the message is clear: the future of the region’s hydrocarbon story may lie in the shale fields of Neuquén rather than the degraded refineries of Carabobo. The era when Venezuela’s vast reserves automatically translated into influence is over. Argentina, once a minor player, is now poised to become a significant exporter and a driver of regional energy integration. Investors, policymakers and neighbours are increasingly looking south of the Andes for supply security and economic opportunity.



Featured


Long live Ukraine - Хай живе Україна - Да здравствует Украина

Es lebe die Ukraine - Да здравствует Украина - Long live Ukraine - Хай живе Україна - Nech žije Ukrajina - Länge leve Ukraina - תחי אוקראינה - Lang leve Oekraïne - Да живее Украйна - Elagu Ukraina - Kauan eläköön Ukraina - Vive l'Ukraine - Ζήτω η Ουκρανία - 乌克兰万岁 - Viva Ucrania - Ať žije Ukrajina - Çok yaşa Ukrayna - Viva a Ucrânia - Trăiască Ucraina - ウクライナ万歳 - Tegyvuoja Ukraina - Lai dzīvo Ukraina - Viva l'Ucraina - Hidup Ukraina - تحيا أوكرانيا - Vivat Ucraina - ขอให้ยูเครนจงเจริญ - Ucraina muôn năm - ژوندی دی وی اوکراین - Yashasin Ukraina - Озак яшә Украина - Živjela Ukrajina - 우크라이나 만세 - Mabuhay ang Ukraine - Lenge leve Ukraina - Nyob ntev Ukraine - Да живее Украина - გაუმარჯოს უკრაინას - Hidup Ukraine - Vivu Ukrainio - Længe leve Ukraine - Živjela Ukrajina - Жыве Украіна - Yaşasın Ukrayna - Lengi lifi Úkraína - Lank lewe die Oekraïne

Stargate project, Trump and the AI war...

In a dramatic return to the global political stage, former President Donald J. Trump, as the current 47th President of the United States of America, has unveiled his latest initiative, the so-called ‘Stargate Project,’ in a bid to cement the United States’ dominance in artificial intelligence and outpace China’s meteoric rise in the field. The newly announced programme, cloaked in patriotic rhetoric and ambitious targets, is already stirring intense debate over the future of technological competition between the world’s two largest economies.According to preliminary statements from Trump’s team, the Stargate Project will consolidate the efforts of leading American tech conglomerates, defence contractors, and research universities under a centralised framework. The former president, who has long championed American exceptionalism, claims this approach will provide the United States with a decisive advantage, enabling rapid breakthroughs in cutting-edge AI applications ranging from military strategy to commercial innovation.“America must remain the global leader in technology—no ifs, no buts,” Trump declared at a recent press conference. “China has been trying to surpass us in AI, but with this new project, we will make sure the future remains ours.”Details regarding funding and governance remain scarce, but early indications suggest the initiative will rely heavily on public-private partnerships, tax incentives for research and development, and collaboration with high-profile venture capital firms. Skeptics, however, warn that the endeavour could fan the flames of an increasingly militarised AI race, raising ethical concerns about surveillance, automation of warfare, and data privacy. Critics also question whether the initiative can deliver on its lofty promises, especially in the face of existing economic and geopolitical pressures.Yet for its supporters, the Stargate Project serves as a rallying cry for renewed American leadership and an antidote to worries over China’s technological ascendancy. Proponents argue that accelerating AI research is paramount if the United States wishes to preserve not just military supremacy, but also the economic and cultural influence that has typified its global role for decades.Whether this bold project will succeed—or if it will devolve into a symbolic gesture—remains to be seen. What is certain, however, is that the Stargate Project has already reignited debate about how best to safeguard America’s strategic future and maintain the balance of power in the fast-evolving arena of artificial intelligence.

Ukraine sends ground robots

Ukraine is putting ground robots to work on a scale that is beginning to change how its army supplies positions, evacuates casualties and conducts some of its most dangerous combat missions. The significance lies in the gradual transfer of battlefield exposure from people to machines. For a force under sustained pressure to preserve experienced soldiers, that change could matter well beyond the individual missions captured on video.The expansion is measurable. By early September 2026, Ukraine’s DELTA battlefield management system had recorded approximately 112,000 logistics and evacuation missions by ground robotic systems since the start of the year. The monthly total rose from 7,511 in January to 25,143 in August, an increase of roughly 3.3 times. These figures describe missions, not the number of robots deployed, and they should not be read as a tally of successful attacks or lives saved. They nevertheless show how far the technology has moved into routine military activity.Supply work explains much of its value. Ammunition, food and water still have to reach troops in positions exposed to surveillance and attack. Wounded soldiers still have to be brought out. A remotely operated vehicle can undertake part of that movement while its operator remains elsewhere. The load may be ordinary; the route is what makes the task dangerous. Repeated across many positions, reducing the number of journeys made by people can alter the daily burden on an infantry force.The strongest case for a robot is often the journey it allows a soldier to avoid. That changes the economics of military equipment. The purchase price matters, but so do the consequences of losing it. A destroyed machine consumes production capacity and money. A lost soldier also removes training, experience and relationships that cannot be replaced on a factory schedule. This is why an apparently modest cargo platform can have greater practical importance than a more spectacular experimental weapon.Combat applications are developing alongside that logistical role. Ukraine’s Third Army Corps includes NC13, a unit specialising in ground robotic operations. In September, corps commander Andrii Biletskyi described an ambition to replace around a third of the corps’ frontline personnel with robots by the end of the year. That remains an objective for a particular formation, rather than a demonstrated reduction across the Ukrainian army. It signals how seriously some commanders now regard the technology.There is a longer history behind the sudden attention. In December 2024, the Khartiia Brigade used a coordinated force of aerial drones and ground robots in an assault near Hlyboke in the Kharkiv region. More than 50 unmanned systems took part. The operation demonstrated that different remotely operated platforms could be combined for surveillance, fire support and attack. It also exposed the limits: ground conditions disabled some machines, and soldiers were still needed to secure and hold the territory afterwards.Those distinctions remain essential. An unmanned vehicle has no crew aboard; that does not make it an autonomous decision-maker. Remote operation, assistance with navigation and independent target selection are different capabilities. Much of the operational change visible in Ukraine concerns the first of these. Human operators, commanders and technicians remain central to making the equipment useful. Describing every remotely controlled vehicle as an artificial intelligence weapon obscures both its present strengths and its weaknesses.The physical environment imposes constraints that software cannot simply remove. A ground vehicle must negotiate soil, vegetation, rubble and obstacles that an aircraft may pass over. Its camera sees from a low position. Communications can be intermittent, and movement through complex terrain requires information that may be incomplete or already outdated. Research on small military robot teams has long identified the combination of restricted visibility, difficult navigation and unreliable communication as a central challenge. Ukraine is testing those problems under combat conditions.Scaling the fleet therefore requires a larger support system. More vehicles mean more operators to train, more repairs, more replacement components and a greater need to coordinate machines with the soldiers around them. The useful measure is how many tasks can be completed reliably over time. A large delivery of equipment can look impressive while leaving unanswered questions about serviceability, workload and availability after repeated deployments.Nor does removing a crew eliminate risk. Operators still work within a military system exposed to attack, and a machine that fails during an evacuation may leave a casualty in danger. Remote control changes where human vulnerability sits. It does not make the mission consequence-free. Reliability is particularly important when the payload is a wounded person rather than ammunition, and success in one role cannot automatically establish suitability for another.The likely effect on the fighting is therefore uneven. Robotic systems can ease dangerous supply tasks and support selected assaults while remaining poorly suited to others. Their value depends on the terrain, the communications environment and the organisation using them. A successful demonstration offers evidence of a capability; repeated use establishes whether a formation can depend on it.Ukraine’s developing robot force is best understood through that practical test. Can it keep a position supplied with fewer exposed soldiers? Can it bring someone back who would otherwise remain stranded? Can it reduce the personnel required for a dangerous task without creating a greater burden elsewhere? The answers will determine how much battlefield activity can move to machines. For the soldiers still holding the line, those gains are substantial enough without the promise of a war fought without people.