-
Lights out in Laos as electricity exports surge
-
Anthropic details Claude misuse as US targets major illicit online marketplace
-
Steven Strogatz weighs AI mathematics advances and their consequences for researchers
-
Venezuelans outside Caracas say capital not sharing blackout burden
-
Anthropic boss calls for AI slowdown, Altman and Musk agree
-
Anthropic boss calls for slowing pace of AI development
-
French IT giant Capgemini sells subsidiary after row over ICE links
-
BRICS nations urge 'maximum restraint' in Middle East war
-
Quebec Brokerage Qubit Insurance Announces New Data on Coverage Shortfalls as Rebuilding Costs Rise
-
Europe eyes battle over 'pervert' AI glasses
-
Lady Gaga welcomes first child with fiance: US media
-
Children in flood-hit Nepal grapple with loss, cling to hope
-
Bhutan business bets on hazelnuts for farming future
-
Venice Film Festival: A look back on the highlights
-
'Widow's Bay' and 'The Pitt' are favorites for Emmys night
-
DR Congo school fire stampede death toll rises to 26: UNICEF
-
Coastal erosion forces cancellation of California music festival
-
Dance Fitness Tempe Announces Expansion of Accessible Digital Movement Programs
-
Argentina's Dirty War rears its head in Venice film
-
Europe saw record summer air traffic despite Mideast war: Eurocontrol
-
UK lawmakers throw out bill to legalise assisted dying
-
Relatives of 9/11 victims hit out at Saudi Arabia -- and US leaders
-
US inflation steady in August, fueling Fed rate hike expectations
-
Relative of 9/11 victim unleashes searing attack on Saudi Arabia
-
New York marks 25th anniversary of 9/11 attacks
-
Czech antitrust office lets Turkey's Pegasus Airlines buy Smartwings
-
Nepal flood reconstruction bill to be $4.78 bn: foreign ministry
-
Investors on edge as energy costs, surging bond yields roil markets
-
JUMO and Standard Bank launch Social Finance Framework to scale inclusive finance in Africa
-
UK lawmakers to vote again on failed assisted dying bill
-
Doomsday tech: could AI really kill us all?
-
Yemen's Houthis complete takeover of Bab al-Mandab area: govt official to AFP
-
French comedy show 'Call my agent' makes film comeback
-
Fast-pace dance takes I.Coast's working-class streets by storm
-
It's all coming back: Celine Dion fans gear up for Paris return
-
Fans celebrate Celine Dion's Paris return with giant karaoke
-
Researchers eye AI revolution in natural disaster forecasts
-
Appreciation, anger await as Trump heads to Irish golf resort
-
US braces for inflation report that may push Fed to hike rates
-
Putin arrives in India for BRICS summit coloured by wars
-
Musk threatens legal action over documentary
-
Carney says in touch with Trump, Canada ready for 'fair' trade deal
-
Latin America fact-check group asks Meta not to replace verification practice
-
Tag Markets Names Craig Lund Chief Executive Officer
-
AI Risks to Enter 60–80% of Liability and Cyber Insurance Underwriting by 2028, ScienceSoft Predicts
-
ECB lifts borrowing costs amid energy shock, opens door for more hikes
-
Tribal Launches Campfire, Letting Business and Technical Teams Build on Salesforce Together
-
Global Tokenized Real Estate Market to Hit up to $3 Trillion by 2030, ScienceSoft Predicts
-
Stocks fall as fresh oil surge fans inflation fears
-
US producer inflation tops expectations as diesel costs jump
Prince Harry, Elton John lose case against UK tabloid
Prince Harry and Elton John on Tuesday lost their case against the Daily Mail's publisher for alleged unlawful information gathering, according to a ruling by London's High Court.
A written judgment published following an 11-week trial earlier this year said the "claimants failed to prove their pleaded allegations... the claims are therefore dismissed".
The prince gave emotional testimony during the proceedings against Associated Newspapers in which several high-profile figures, including John and actor Elizabeth Hurley, accused the tabloid publisher of invading their privacy.
Harry's lawyers had said they were seeking "substantial" damages on behalf of their clients over articles dating from 1993 to 2018.
It was the third and final case brought by the Duke of Sussex in his acrimonious legal battle with British tabloids, which has further strained relations with the royal family.
Harry, 41 -- the youngest son of King Charles III -- has also been involved in other legal spats, including over his police protection in Britain following his dramatic departure from frontline royal duties six years ago.
The prince, now living in California, arrived in Britain on Monday for a five-day visit expected to go ahead mostly without his wife and children after the family was refused police protection.
The trip, to mark the one-year countdown to next year's Invictus Games for wounded veterans, which Harry founded, was meant to be his first family trip back to the UK in four years.
But a source close to the Duke of Sussex told AFP that Harry's wife Meghan, son Archie and daughter Lilibet would not accompany him on the London leg of the trip after the family was refused security.
Arrangements for the rest of the trip were still under consideration, the source said, leaving it unclear whether the whole family would visit but stay outside the capital.
Contradictory statements about plans to stay at Buckingham Palace while in London added to the prince's headaches.
Just ahead of Harry's arrival, Buckingham Palace contradicted the duke's team to say that he would not be staying at the palace after missing a deadline to accept the accommodation offer.
Harry's spokesman said it was "disappointing" the offer to be hosted by his father had been "withdrawn at the last moment", in a statement sent to AFP.
- Security woes -
It was unclear whether the prince would meet his father during the trip. He is last understood to have met Charles, who is being treated for an undisclosed form of cancer, at the monarch's London residence Clarence House in September 2025.
Harry and Meghan left Britain for North America in 2020 amid a bitter feud with his family, which worsened as Harry published his tell-all memoir "Spare".
The prince has since said he wishes to reconcile with his father, but the confusion over where Harry was going to stay in London suggest relations remain difficult.
According to his spokesperson, Harry had to make "alternative security arrangements" for the trip after publicly funded protection was refused, contributing to the delay in accepting Buckingham Palace's accommodation offer.
"It is therefore unclear why, having formally accepted the accommodation offer, it has now been withdrawn at the last moment," the spokesman said.
Beyond logistical complications, the palace believed the legal judgment complicated matters as it could compromise the king's constitutional position, the PA news agency reported.
Last year, Harry said he felt unable to bring his family to Britain after losing a court case to have his security restored during visits home.
Harry has long blamed the media for the death of his mother Princess Diana, who was killed in a Paris car crash in 1997 while trying to shake off the paparazzi.
"He understands how that protection can fail and how catastrophic, therefore, those results can be," Simon Morgan, a former bodyguard for the royal family, told AFP on Monday.
P.Petrenko--CPN